May 25, 20206 yr More to the above discussed, I just had a closer look at the most recent shots again and noticed something. Compare these shots of the 172 G1000 and the 152. While the 152, interestingly enough, has 3-digit fractions on its COM panel, the G1000 has only 2. Now in this particular shot of the 152 there is no 8.33 freq tuned, but the 3-digit variant could eventually mean it's 8.33 capable, but of course it does not have to. Not so the G1000, which definitely is 25 kHz-only so far. This is not a good sign. If it stays like that there is absolutely no way to tune in a vast amount of real life freqs. Especially since recently a humongous number of freqs was changed from 25 to 8.33, e. g. 136.5 became 136.505, 118.025 became 118.030 and so on. Edited May 25, 20206 yr by badderjet
May 25, 20206 yr Fully functional and accurate Garmin GPS please! Like Reality XP 🙂 Tomáš Pokorný SYSTEM -> CPU: Intel Core i7-8700K @ 5.0 GHz | GPU: Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 Ti @ 2027 MHz | RAM: 2x8 GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200 MHz | MOBO: AsRock Z370 Extreme 4 | SSD: Kingston 256 GB, Samsung 860 EVO 1 TB | HDD: Western Digital 1 TB | CPU COOLER: Corsair H115i | CASE: Corsair Obsidian Series 750D | PSU: Seasonic Focus Gold 750W EQUIPMENT -> YOKE: Saitek Pro Flight Yoke System + Throttle Quadrant, Saitek X52 | RUDDER PEDALS: Saitek Pedals | CAMERA: TrackIR 5
May 25, 20206 yr Integrated Charts (maybe some deal with Jeppesen?) Smarter ATC which knows procedures and IFR Cat 3 auto land in Zero visibility Greazer. http://youtube.com/c/Greazer
May 25, 20206 yr 1 hour ago, Greazer said: Integrated Charts (maybe some deal with Jeppesen?) Why would they, if they already announced the Navblue partnership. Wouldn't expect anything Jepp here.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.