16 hours ago, Tuskin38 said:

I doubt it, since it's not a bug.

Asobo clearly stated in interviews that they also want scenery issues be reported and that Zendesk is the way to report anything "officially" 

1 hour ago, Marco Manieri said:

Asobo clearly stated in interviews that they also want scenery issues be reported and that Zendesk is the way to report anything "officially" 

the bridge not matching how it looks IRL isn't a a scenery issue though.

If there wasn't any kind of bridge there at all, than that would be an issue.

Edited August 24, 20205 yr by Tuskin38

I have a similar issue with a local bridge (Tobin bridge over the Mystic river near Boston)... the bridge is there, sort of, but there's "stuff" underneath it and as a result not only does it look wrong but you can't fly under the bridge.  The most frustrating thing is that bridge was fine in FSX.  You'd think when developing new scenery , they'd use the old program as a starting point.

Edited August 24, 20205 yr by ELaw

18 hours ago, Tuskin38 said:

I doubt it, since it's not a bug.

Zendesk is also meant for feedback.

18 hours ago, Sesquashtoo said:

Well...let's put the Blue Water, the Detroit Ambassador amongst the Michigan bridges we'd like to see LOOK like bridges.  I still get a kick outta watching cars approaching overpasses...and then climb over them, rather then slip under them as in P3D/FSX/XP11.   Great traction on those MSFS car tires...the best!

Actually flew around Windsor/Detroit on the weekend and thought they did a decent job on the Ambassador Bridge (I'm running things at medium 1080 due to the current state of my rig)

Chris

I got this in response to reporting an issue with an airport (beacon tower in the middle of a runway), new POIs will be part of upcoming updates, so maybe that will include new bridges.

Edited August 25, 20205 yr by Tuskin38