October 27, 20223 yr Of course "None" and "Static" would be the less realistic setting, while varied and changing weather should give better results. "Society has become so fake that the truth actually bothers people".
October 27, 20223 yr 3 minutes ago, Murmur said: Of course "None" and "Static" would be the less realistic setting, while varied and changing weather should give better results. Ok thanks I setting was hidden below, just need to slide it down a bit. I also notice the rescan button at the top for scanning the latest weather in the real weather mode for the latest weather.
October 27, 20223 yr 31 minutes ago, Murmur said: Of course "None" and "Static" would be the less realistic setting, while varied and changing weather should give better results. Only available for "Manual Weather". I always fly with real weather.
October 28, 20223 yr Moderator On 10/27/2022 at 12:06 PM, Murmur said: I think they're doing pretty well compared to those who have a much bigger budget (same cloud height, thickness and coverage in both sims): Honestly, I actually think the clouds and lighting in XP12 look better in your shots, much more natural (although low resolution). I love how MFS looks and it can produce spectacular views with great performance, but I feel it tends to over exaggerate the saturation and lighting to produce pleasing but less natural effects. If LR can improve the performance on similar hardware, it's a great way forward.
.thumb.jpeg.ff038c23b575531d7922f736a02a8542.jpeg)
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.