New Grusch interview.

[dmwalker 611]

1 hour ago, martin-w said:

Grusch wasn't there and it sounded like it was a pile of nonsense.

Now the focus will be on the Schumer- Rounds Amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act, which, if adopted, would presumably allow Grusch to present his evidence because it would no longer be classified.

[martin-w 3,252]

Well, clearly they have a lot to hide, or they wouldn't be fighting so hard to prevent anything being revealed, even in a SCIF.

[dmwalker 611]

 

 

2:08  "We can't even find out who is allowed to know"

 

Edited October 28, 2023 by dmwalker

[martin-w 3,252]

Same as in the past, stonewalling until everyone gets fed up and stops asking. 

[martin-w 3,252]

Grusch is on the 3 hour Rogan podcast if anyone wants to check it out.

 

 

Edited November 23, 2023 by martin-w

[martin-w 3,252]

I'm watching it now on Spotify. A lot of details and so far he's coming across believable. 😵

Edited November 23, 2023 by martin-w

[DaviiB 104]

On 11/23/2023 at 1:16 PM, martin-w said:

I'm watching it now on Spotify. A lot of details and so far he's coming across believable. 😵

It was a great podcast. The long-form format is great for understanding people's true positions, or complex subjects. 

Rumor floating around the Internet today is the Schumer amendment may not survive in-tact, due in most part to two congressmen (mentioned in the podcast) who are bought and paid for by Lockheed Martin, Boeing etc. 

Do with that information what you will. 

If there truly is nothing to this subject, why is the declassificarion of related government records being stopped by the companies directly implicated in the cover up? 

No, that's not evidence for the existence of NHI.

It's evidence for a cover up of the evidence for the existence of NHI. (does the logic follow there?) 

DB

[dmwalker 611]

1 hour ago, DaviiB said:

Rumor floating around the Internet today is the Schumer amendment may not survive in-tact, due in most part to two congressmen (mentioned in the podcast) who are bought and paid for by Lockheed Martin, Boeing etc. 

Are these unilateral decisions of these two congressmen or are they the majority decisions of their respective committees?

[martin-w 3,252]

9 hours ago, DaviiB said:

Rumor floating around the Internet today is the Schumer amendment may not survive in-tact, due in most part to two congressmen (mentioned in the podcast) who are bought and paid for by Lockheed Martin, Boeing etc. 

Do with that information what you will. 

If there truly is nothing to this subject, why is the declassificarion of related government records being stopped by the companies directly implicated in the cover up? 

 

Suspicious isn't it? 

Do you recall the names of the two congressmen? 

[dmwalker 611]

2 hours ago, martin-w said:

Do you recall the names of the two congressmen?

"The bill has cleared the Senate but is threatened in the House by Mike Turner and Mike Rogers."

Mike Turner is the Chair of the House Intelligence Committee.

Mike Rogers is the Chair of the Armed Services Committee.

Edited November 25, 2023 by dmwalker

[martin-w 3,252]

https://www.askapol.com/p/house-intel-chair-mike-turner-afraid#details

No More UAP Hearings Because of Mike Turner | Deep Concerns Further Hearings Will Embarrass Department Of Defense

Quote

 

Rep. Mike Turner from Ohio who is the Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has convinced Rep. James Comer who is the Chairman of the House Oversight Committee, That any more UAP hearings by the H.O.C. "Would cause serious harm to the reputation of the Department of Defense in the eyes of the public, and should be avoided for the foreseeable future."

As a result of this decision, there will be no further hearings on this topic by the H.O.C.

Rep. Mike Turner is directly influenced by the military contractors in his state.

 

 

 

[martin-w 3,252]

 

[martin-w 3,252]

The latest is that the CIA are retrieving UFO's and there's far more than 9.

This is getting even more bizarre.

 

 

[dmwalker 611]

16 minutes ago, martin-w said:

The latest is that the CIA are retrieving UFO's and there's far more than 9.

Taken from the Daily Mail:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12796167/CIA-secret-office-UFO-retrieval-missions-whistleblowers.html

Edited November 29, 2023 by dmwalker

[DaviiB 104]

This is getting very interesting. 

It's like watching a Cricket match between the New York Giants and Manchester United. 

I have no idea what's going to happen next, but I am absolutely here for it. 

We've established that the truth is somewhere to the right of "there are weird objects in the sky that don't seem to have a prosaic explanation"....... except everything to the right of that is bananas. Now it's just a matter of how crazy it's going to get. 

 

Note: I consider "the US and other governments have been conducting a fully-coordinated psyop on the entire world for 70 years" to be a crazier outcome than the Alien/NHI hypothesis. That would be quite the feat. 

 

DB