September 13, 20232 yr Author Hmmm.... Look more like archeological artifacts. Not beings. Discovered in 2017 in Peru. Edited September 13, 20232 yr by martin-w
September 13, 20232 yr 8 minutes ago, martin-w said: Same forensic specialist. Logical, since he may be the only one with relevant expertise. Dugald Walker
September 13, 20232 yr Author 4 minutes ago, dmwalker said: Logical, since he may be the only one with relevant expertise. Bet you that these things don't get sent anywhere else respectable for analysis. Does that look realistic to you, in the video I posted? Edited September 13, 20232 yr by martin-w
September 13, 20232 yr 11 minutes ago, martin-w said: Same forensic specialist. Indeed. I'm all in favor of looking into it. As usual with these things though there will probably be no peer review, in fact no proper research at all, no replicated research. No proper science. We'll probably get guys like that Gary Nolan guy claiming he almost had access, but not quite. But we shall see. Here's some of their data (apparently), published to the National Library of Medicine. I can't 100% verify that it's the correct posting, but they are what I found. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA865375 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA861322 Would be good to have someone who can decipher this stuff take a look. Apparently, the bodies are being made available for inspection / analysis by 3rd parties. Also, they listed the institutions / organizations that participated in the analysis of the bodies. Harrisburg University and Lakehead University (both in the US) are among them. For those who speak Spanish, here's the full video from the Mexican Congressional Hearing on September 12th. At about 2:35, they compare the (known hoax) 2017 case that's in the news article you posted (I think), to the presented specimen. Translations of the full video are in progress and should be up in a day or two.
September 13, 20232 yr Author 4 minutes ago, DaviiB said: Here's some of their data (apparently), published to the National Library of Medicine. I can't 100% verify that it's the correct posting, but they are what I found. Am I being stupid (likely) or does it say Organism: Homo Sapiens? Sample: SAMN29911622 • SRS14126783 • All experiments • All runs Organism: Homo sapiens
September 13, 20232 yr Just now, martin-w said: Am I being stupid (likely) or does it say Organism: Homo Sapiens? Sample: SAMN29911622 • SRS14126783 • All experiments • All runs Organism: Homo sapiens I saw that as well. This is exactly why someone with a scientific background should be looking at this. It could just be the Null Hypothesis.....if you were submitting a specimen for analysis, you have to start somewhere.....like trying (and subsequently failing) to prove the specimen is Human (Homo Sapien). DB
September 13, 20232 yr 14 minutes ago, martin-w said: Does that look realistic to you, in the video I posted? No, they look like primitive clay figurines but there are x-rays showing a skeletal structure, apparently. Dugald Walker
September 13, 20232 yr Author I dare say, within the next few days, it will be all over the internet and on major news sites.
September 13, 20232 yr Author Just now, dmwalker said: No, they look like primitive clay figurines but there are x-rays showing a skeletal structure, apparently. I guess if you were going to fake it you'd build your clay figurine around a fake skeleton.
September 13, 20232 yr 11 minutes ago, martin-w said: Am I being stupid (likely) or does it say Organism: Homo Sapiens? They had to classify it somehow and, since there isn't yet a classification "Organism: Extraterrestrial", they put it into the nearest available. Dugald Walker
September 13, 20232 yr Author https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/aliens-in-mexico-congress-ufo-b2410477.html Quote Alleged “non-human” alien corpses have been displayed to Mexican politicians at the country’s Congress. The two small alleged alien corpses, retrieved from Cusco, Peru, were presented in windowed boxes in Mexico City on Wednesday, stirring excitement within the UFO conspiracy theorist community. The event was spearheaded by journalist and ufologist Jaime Maussan, who testified under oath that the mummified specimens are not part of “our terrestrial evolution”, with almost a third of their DNA remaining “unknown”, reported Mexican media. The claims by the self-claimed ‘ufologist’ have not been proven and Mr Maussan has previously been associated with claims of discoveries that have later been debunked. Mr Maussan has previously been associated with claims of “alien” discoveries that have later been debunked, including five mummies found in Peru in 2017 that were later shown to be human children. Edited September 13, 20232 yr by martin-w
September 13, 20232 yr 9 minutes ago, martin-w said: What's wrong with Unknown? Was that classification available? I assume it's a rigid system and you can't just go making up new classifications without going through a committee or a head librarian or something. Dugald Walker
September 13, 20232 yr 10 minutes ago, martin-w said: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/aliens-in-mexico-congress-ufo-b2410477.html It's unfortunate that a ufologist was involved. That lowers the overall credibility by about 30%. Dugald Walker
September 13, 20232 yr Author You might find this interesting. Chris Lehto gets too excited, but some good info.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.