2 hours ago, Jack_Sawyer said:

Thanks Sylvester but no matter how many times I try Discord I could Berger it to work or understand how to use it. 😞 

Jack, I struggled with Discord at first, still do.

It is a weird collection of text, primarily, seemingly from Win98. But you need to register in Discord to be able to open the doors to the various groups & sub groups. Lot of useful stuff in there if you can pries it open😑

Good luck

T45

19 minutes ago, Treetops45 said:

Jack, I struggled with Discord at first, still do.

It is a weird collection of text, primarily, seemingly from Win98. But you need to register in Discord to be able to open the doors to the various groups & sub groups. Lot of useful stuff in there if you can pries it open😑

Good luck

T45

Will do, the interface seems so, well, discordant. I like good old fashioned forums like this one. But I will try.

On 2/13/2026 at 12:17 PM, Aamir said:

Depends on a lot of things - the fuel burn computed in the trip field should be close enough within around 200-300kg provided the winds are uplinked, the runways on both DEP and ARR are selected, and the procedures on either end are selected. This also means that if Simbrief has/includes step climbs, step descents, etc - that they too are programmed and inserted into the FMS to reflect. Then finally, double check the Simbrief wind uplink to ensure the winds are reflective of the reality you find yourself in - i.e the data is good - sometimes it deviates! 

All in though, the next update should also provide some enhancements to the accuracy in this area.

Hey Aamir, can you confirm there have been some accuracy updates to the simbrief flight planning x real fuel burn? I just cant find any update in the changelogs, as well as in the simbrief profile. Thank you!!

I think, its affecting many people, e. g. other thread: avsim.com/forums/topic/701681-fenix-a320-simbrief-profile-wrong-fuel/?do=getNewComment

Edited October 22Oct 22 by CallsignBA