5 hours ago5 hr 41 minutes ago, V1ROTA7E said:I mean, with all due respect, you were satisfied with 30 FPS for a long time before upgrading…not saying you’re wrong, but just different standards."Different standards" seems a bit broad and subjective to the point of potentially obscuring reality. If we are truly comparing apples to oranges we would need to both look at images captured from 2020 of old, and 2024 current, from similar distances from various objects, and at a zoom level we would actually use in game. Something like that has the best chance of being as close to an objective comparison as possible. My bet is that if you and I did that somehow, we would likely concur w/ each other. 30FPS was the best I could do at the time and discovering the value of sterling FTV truly made 30FPS tolerable, when that was the best I could reliably get while keeping all parameters at Ultra. It would be hard to accept now that I have become used to 60-90FPS. But I've also traded in best image quality for that higher FPS-fg. Because of the strobe effect in some terrain types using NV DLSS FG at low rates like 60FPS I sometimes have to go to 90 FPS or more....or turn FG off and live with 45FPS-native.From late 2020, Fussen, Germany:Similar view from 2024 now. I see more detail in this image especially in the mountains and even the grass field immediately below: Edited 4 hours ago4 hr by Noel Noel System: 9900X3D Noctua NH-D15 G2, MSI Pro 650-P WiFi, G.SKILL 64GB (2 x 32GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR5 6000, WD NVMe 2Tb x 1, Sabrent NVMe 2Tb x 1, RTX 4090 FE, Corsair RM1000W PSU, Win11 Home, LG Ultra Curved Gsync Ultimate 3440x1440, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Case, TCA Boeing Edition Yoke & TQ, Cessna Trim Wheel, RTSS Framerate Limiter w/ Front Edge Sync. Aircraft used in MSFS 2024: Fenix A320, Aerosoft CRJ, FBW, WT 787X, I-Fly 737 MAX 8, Citation Longitude.
Create an account or sign in to comment