CoolDude

I gather it's roundly mocked in the community because vanishingly few pilots actually use the 'tree' pronunciation in real life.

Sounds and model are great. Couldn't import full simbrief flightplan into the FMC, though. I appreciate that it begins to taxi with zero thrust (I assume this is realistic), the ground behaviour in general is nice.

There's shockingly little reaction yet to this! Any first thoughts?

That was the new WU being released

Any news yet of this release? OP suggested the devs were saying August on Discord.

Looks like another fantastic job! I have one super minor request: could the number of colourful vehicles in the parking lots be toned down a little bit? Like in many third party sceneries, there are as many bright yellow/red/blue cars as there are black/gray/earthtone - more than you'd expect, to be honest - and the colourful cars look much brighter than you'd typically observe from a distance. I think it's a limitation of the the lighting system in the sim that makes them stand out and makes them resemble toys, a teeny bit immersion breaking in an otherwise spectacular-looking work. Only mentioning it because it's a really minor thing I also noticed at YOW.

Any chance passengers could be updated to carry light bags and backpacks? Most passengers don't waltz on board without any carry-on.

Similarly, is there any way to turn waaaay down or turn off the repetitive boarding/deboarding passenger sounds? I can hear seatbelts buckling and a couple of 'Thank you' sound clips at full volume only for a couple of minutes before I begin going nuts, and boarding takes so much longer.

Haven't posted in years, but speaking as a local, this scenery is VERY well done. Awesome job, glad to see Ottawa get some love.

Fortunately, more than 5,000 people live in Chicago, IL so it doesn't require addon scenery. In fact it even used to be the MSFS default city.Also it's meaningful to me because the next President of the United States lives there. ;)

Yes, that makes perfect sense. I uninstalled FSWC because the installer didn't automatically create a new FSWC directory after I had changed the install path when installing. Thus, the uninstaller thought that the partition FSWC had been installed on was all FSWC content, which it deleted when uninstalled :(

Edit: sorry, wrong thread, ignore please

hmmm seems like it happened to me too, but I wasn't sure if FSWC was responsible. I installed FSWC into a directory that I didn't want it in, then I uninstalled it, and then when I tried to install it into the right place it said that it couldn't find FSX, and when I navigated to my FSX partition, the entire partition was empty. I've since reinstalled FSX and FSWC and it's working fine.I'm running Vista 32 bit with FSX Deluxe. FSX was/is installed on my G: partition, my OS is on my C: partition.

I'm not sure I'm completely understanding this then... I thought that the conveyor belt was like a treadmill, and that it would match the aircraft's speed precisely. If the plane was going at 150 knots at it's undercarriage, the belt would be going at 150 knots in the opposite direction, resulting in zero forward motion on the part of the plane overall. Zero forward motion wound result in no air over the wings, and no liftoff.

I have trouble believing that the test holds sway over the debate. Why was the aircraft in the test moving forward (the camera had to pan) if the conveyor belt was "matching" the plane's speed? If it was matching the plane's speed, then the plane should not have moved, no matter how much it accelerated. Zero movement would have meant zero airflow over the wings, resulting in no takeoff.