CoolDude

Mandatory Airbus Sharklet advertisement:

Much appreciated. Are you also working on seated passengers support for the Fenix A321?

I do appreciate how photogrammetry shows off what real parked cars look like from a distance. I notice every other addon maker has the same strange variety of plasticky bright lime green, yellow and red cars and trucks that look like childrens' toys in every airport parking lot - maybe an SDK default?

MSFS starts now for me but it's asking me to reset all my settings. I'll try again later and hopefully my old settings will be restored.

Amazing work. Will be great to see this integrated into the other top tier addons. So glad the boarding sounds have also been revisited, it was repetitive and immersion breaking. A potential future step for immersion is having every passenger have a carryon suitcase / briefcase / backpack etc.

Fortunately, more than 5,000 people live in Chicago, IL so it doesn't require addon scenery. In fact it even used to be the MSFS default city.Also it's meaningful to me because the next President of the United States lives there. ;)

Yes, that makes perfect sense. I uninstalled FSWC because the installer didn't automatically create a new FSWC directory after I had changed the install path when installing. Thus, the uninstaller thought that the partition FSWC had been installed on was all FSWC content, which it deleted when uninstalled :(

Edit: sorry, wrong thread, ignore please

hmmm seems like it happened to me too, but I wasn't sure if FSWC was responsible. I installed FSWC into a directory that I didn't want it in, then I uninstalled it, and then when I tried to install it into the right place it said that it couldn't find FSX, and when I navigated to my FSX partition, the entire partition was empty. I've since reinstalled FSX and FSWC and it's working fine.I'm running Vista 32 bit with FSX Deluxe. FSX was/is installed on my G: partition, my OS is on my C: partition.

I'm not sure I'm completely understanding this then... I thought that the conveyor belt was like a treadmill, and that it would match the aircraft's speed precisely. If the plane was going at 150 knots at it's undercarriage, the belt would be going at 150 knots in the opposite direction, resulting in zero forward motion on the part of the plane overall. Zero forward motion wound result in no air over the wings, and no liftoff.

I have trouble believing that the test holds sway over the debate. Why was the aircraft in the test moving forward (the camera had to pan) if the conveyor belt was "matching" the plane's speed? If it was matching the plane's speed, then the plane should not have moved, no matter how much it accelerated. Zero movement would have meant zero airflow over the wings, resulting in no takeoff.

Use the Firefox web browser, keep Windows updated, and be intelligent in what you d/l and what files you open. If you do that, you don't really need a system-slowing antivirus. (this is, though, coming from a self-described computer geek...)

Did you botch the installation of the FSX water tweak? That's what my water looked like when I misspelled the name of the new water file.

Excellent work gentlemen, these shader hacks are doing some great things for the Flight Sim. I'll try out these new RGB values.

I'm running the same card and drivers, and have the same problem. It's pretty annoying.Until it's fixed, I'm not flying in rain or snow.