cuijinbird

Thanks. I think no wave along the sea shore is acceptable in this stage.I believe my gtx 480 not only supports dx10 well, but also dx11, even its oc performance is higher than default gtx 580.All settings are highest or maximum. But I am quite sure I can hardly see the water animation, as todev said.Can you see the animated waves or reflection at 700feet? If it is hard to see, I think that is far away from realistic scene.

Nvidia gtx 480. I think the real surface should have the dynamic reflection at least. Even I look at the surface at 500ft to 1000ft, I still feel the water is static. That's not real for me if you can imagine what you see when you were in a final approach to an airport near sea shore.

Close looking at the surface is fine,quite realistic. But when u reach some altitude, do you think the water seems static, no waves, just like a mirror with reflection. The water effect is set to maximum. I don't know it is my gpu rendering problem or Flight inherent one. How about yours? Do you feel realistic surface at some level?

Problem solved. You need to change "Language for non-unicode program" to "English (United State)" under "Administrative" in your win7 region, language setting.Why MS treat the people differently?

Solved. You need to change "Language for non-unicode program" to "English (United State)" under "Administrative" in your win7 region, language setting.Interesting, how MS can do this? ;)

Ha, understand after reading a lot of your post here. You don't understand my anxious about part of Flight is not working. ;-)Pls vote and help.

Thanks for all helps.If you can run job normally, can you list your os and configuration if you like? A number of players have reported this problem, but till now no solution is provided.

Hi, styckx. Can you describe what's your OS and how you install Flight? Are you a beta tester? Thank you very.This problem really annoys me because I've paid for Maule wholly for cargo job, but there is no response, even without one word from MS staffs or Admins when the problem is reported on Microsoft Official Forums.

Hi, Wu, your job is working? Thanks.

Can anyone who can sucessfully start the job post :0) Can you start your job without/with paid DLC?1) your OS (win7 32 or 64 bit or xp) or your rig detailed configuration2) how did you install MS Flight (using Game for Windows Marketplace or standalone installation package or the client downloaded directly from MS Flight official website)?3) have you already installed FSX or other sim software4) Flash player version (Because the menu used in Flight is all flash elements)That maybe give us some clues to find what's wrong with our Flight.Thanks a lot for all your help.

I tried, but failed to solve the job start problem. We have no idea why we has these problems, but the others have none. Does some other software conflict with Flight?I also saw the thread in microsoft offical forums, but till now there is no solution for us. I believe quite number of players have the same problem.Can anyone help?

Thanks for report this. Therefore, I guess different vc2008/vc2010 library redistributions are installed for different individuals. @n4gix, can u list your vc2010 redist version? You can check this in win7 control panel -> uninstall application. So I can reinstall the version you have. Thanks in advance. :), I guess we have latest version of VC 2010 redist that might cause the problem. Maybe need to reinstall the version included in the installation pack. I will try when I get back home.

@Kabronicus, thanks.Does anyone meet the same problems with my 1st one?Im using win64, installed the game in Game for Windows Marketplace. I tried to reinstall it, but problem is still there.Anyone can help me solve the problem? Thanks.

1) Even the "$100 burger", I can't start. When I enter into "select job", chose the ICON A5, and press the "start mission" button, the 3D-model plane disappears and nothing is started. It is very strange and no error info is displayed. I only have two default free ones, without paid DLC. Do anyone meet the same problem? I think the basic "$100 burger" shouldn't requir the other DLC.2) I also has a problem when my mouse curse is placed on some instruments inside the cockpit. For example, in AoA indicator (the meter between speed indicator and altiude indicator) in ICON A5, if I place the cursor on it, it displays some internal scripts in the hint box, while other meters are normal to display the indications.Thanks.

Hi, All,As corinaco said, if you unpack .pak files, you could find all the similar things and structure with what we have in FSX.So we believe that MS Flight has a lot of extentions in future. What I worried is the cost of each DLC, appreatly, current price is too high.And another worry is MS Studio can let third-party developer publish DLC, e.g. PMDG? Proof for the content.

:).... Bumpl!! Thanks, corinoco.This is true technical post/thread.So guys, don't blame it so early. Just be patient after you research it.

Thanks for the analysis. In my 'SimObject' folder, only 'airplane.dll' is listed, different with FSX structure. I only have the 2 default free plane, if you have new installed one, can you see other contents inside the folder?Anyway, hope as what you said, it could bring more flexibility into it.

Hi, All,Does anyone notice the instrument in the cockpit?They actually have Nav Radio, Altimeter tune and trim etc.Also, the legends of the map show available VOR, NDB and ILS, and the airport gives the radio frequency info.So I guess the interface of modeling instruments and other details has already built in the game.Can anyone confirm if this MS flight is a framework or not? That means the API can be invoked by third-party addons, or MS studio could release an SDK for further extension. Can someone explain?If MS Flight is completely like what currently has, I could say that's too disappoint for simmers, and it is a definitely childlish game.If MS Flight currently is a demo or beta test, and will provide the API and SDK in next several months, I would say this is a great aviation simulation framework. All could expect more and more third-party addons to add the complexity and realism. That's truely great! Because the current multi-core optimization and graphic effect is far better than FSX.Does anyone get in-depth into MS Flight and research this?I hope we could hear some office announcement to confirm the position of this product.Thanks.

To customer support: I think this problem is not on myself and not accident. So I recommend developer should check .dll and its related Microsoft .NET framework redistribution version. Because I believe PMDG_737NGX.dll in gauges folder might be partially invalid under some .NET framework version. I installed 737ngx on my laptop which has Home x64 win7 OS, and lower version .NET framework. The bird works well. I think ultimate win7 should also be OK. Pls check! Thanks a lot.

I reinstalled the FSX and then installed 737ngx, the problem is still same.And all the textures in "Shift+F1"(2D panel) are not correctly located, no PFD and ND displayed. I guess all of this problems are related with dll and xml files. My spec: win7 ultimate, i7 920, gtx 480 and 6gb ram. Thanks.

Thank you very much, I will try this.

I deleted the FSX.cfg, and reload the dll, and the problem is still same.

The hydraulic system has some problems: 1) the "Low Pressure" light never illuminated even I turn off the elec and engine pumps switches. 2) After loading the cold&dark state, the hydralic pressure is forever around 50 even the engines are started, and flight control is displayed as "Low Pressure". 3) After loading the cold&dark state, the "Low Pressure" lights in hydralic panel is never illuminated after starting APU or engines(switch is put to "off" in hydraulic panel). Does anyone meet the same problem? To customer support: could you tell me how to solve this? and I also tried to reinstall this ngx addon, but still has the same problem. Thanks.

Very eager to see the result! :(

Wonderful, you got UT2 that is fairly new :( . Every setting is pretty high expect the water effect. I think if you change ATI to Nvidia, the water effect could be set higher without loss of frames. Correct?Also, yes, the fsx is not well optimized for today's multicore, the first core is used intensively but the others for loading the scenery and environment are not fully used. There is no update in the future. And we can only put our hope to a new simulator.20-30 fps is enough for both appreciating the beautiful scene and controling the plane.I guess i7-980x+gtx480 could terminate the age when whatever the desktop is used, some addons cannot run smoothly to be playable. Expect to see your clip, and after that, I consider to buy this bull. :( Thanks for your first hand result, crashmax!