Anders_Weber

I own both the NGX and the 777. I have not been able to get either of them to do a correct holding, unless it is a holding directly on the route same inbound course etc. Whenever the holding requires a teardrop/offset or parallel entry, the plane seems to do whatever it want. I believe in the real plane that the entry to the holding is also drawn on the ND (from FCOM) which is not the case in either 777 or NGX. I love both products, but I would like a comment of someone who knows wether it is a limitation of FSX or PMDG was not able of getting it done realistically? As I said, I LOVE both products, but whenever I do a holding I feel like something is missing/not correct.

It is simple math using difference in angles and finding the cosine to that angle multiplying by the wind component. Have a look here http://www.theairlinepilots.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1639&sid=69f4c769581d01825ee7378032f6d534

Maybe it would be possible to choose when installing SP2 if youd prefer a HGS cockpit or a Real dimensions Cockpit without HGS.. I know that it could take a long time. I am not a programmer

I would rather see the correct cockpit dimensions, since I rarely use the HGS.. Not complaining though but I think that it would make more if a simulation with correct windscreen dimension which every simmer use, instead of compromising dimensions for some feature that a lot never uses and many airlines have not installed. Just me 2 cents

Great news! Simple love the Tripple, hopning for NGX SP2 news as well. But silence usually means nothing new, so that say will come! 300ER will be soo awesome, can't wait! Great news! Simple love the Tripple, hopning for NGX SP2 news as well. But silence usually means nothing new, so that day will come 300ER will be soo awesome, can't wait!

As far as I know their avionics for the 737NG is from a certain other develeoper, but not PMDG..

I fly IFR in real world in small airplanes. I fly holdings procedures etc at 90 kts. Then I use the rule to add the wind headwind comp pr min.. IE: if I have 30 kts headwind I add 30 seconds pr minute. If its a tailwind I use half the wind componen.. If 30 kts tailwind i subtract 15 seconds pr minute.. But that only works at 90 kts, not 200.. So was just curious if anyone knew a rule of thumb like the abobe

Is there a general rule of thumb of correcting outbound timing when flying rawdata in big jets? I was inspired by Nick Collets videopreview of the 777.. That got me wondering. What do you do when flying a holding at 200 kts? How do you correct the timing for known wind? Hope this makes sence!

Is there any diffrence between a 2 gb and 4 gb GTX 670 in fsx? I mean, most cars have 2 gb. I only use one monitor, sort of thinking 2 gb would be enough?

Thanks guys. I realize I wasnt clear in my first post. I have around 300-500 bucks to spend. I would never spend 800-1000 $ on a graphics card. I don't have that kind of money B) What would you suggest at around 3-500 $?

I am currently running a rig with a i7 920 Overclocked to 4.2 Ghz hyperthreading enabled. I have 6 gigs of tripple channel ram, but an old GTX 275. When i build the machine i was on a budget, so I got the GTX 275 with around 900Mb Ram. It worked great, but now I am relly considering a new GPU, since that is my bottleneck I Guess!? I mostly play FSX, but altså other games. Until now my computer has run everything nice and smooth, but I have trouble keeping up with new games like Far Cry 3, Bioshock infinite etc. Altso it would be great to see a little performance boost in fsx with a new GPU!? What do you guys recommend?

Is it possible to, or can it be done with the SDK, to get the DU's displayed on a second computer not running fs over LAN?

Really great shots! Starting to get that "NGX Feeling" All over again.. You know, checking the forums each day, hoping for news of the Tripple! Really looking forward to (hopefully) see som video-previews like the ones given pre-NGX release!

I really love how You can see the shadow ot the aircraft when they descend through the clouds !

Hi guys, just wanted to share this Nice video of a 737 landing in Klagenfurt! Really nice approach descinding through a low cloud layer in Mountain terrain with ovc en 400 feet.. Really nice video!!