sniper228

Sounds interesting, care to provide more detail? Does it simulate various relays coming online when switching from lets say battery power to apu/ground power?? or avionics fans coming on? Details, Details!!

Well the point of my post was... While fully knowing both Squawkbox and FSInn work with FSX, I thought the overwhelming majority of people used FSInn...

Yep! I mean we all fly around constantly looking out the wings right? Peripheral vision anyone? The real question is would you buy it without the wing flex??!!!!

Your a BETA tester and trying to use Squawkbox and FSX??? Really?? come on!

Very interesting discussion!! While they are multiple points and topics that seem to be getting thrown onto here I will say this... In my career so far in aviation there seems to be 2 ways of thinking about the regulations, it goes like this: What do the regulations say? (Ex. If it's not in there I can't do it) What do the regulations don't say? (Ex. If it doesn't exist in the regs, then i'm going to do it!) So take this with a grain of salt, the regulations were made vague on purpose!!! Hence this very little but yet very important reg the FAA just stuck in there: This allows the FAA to basically take it case by case, If you fly around all the time without charts and don't cause harm, or violate airspace, then yes no one is ever going to get you over not having current charts on board. Now if you take off violate airspace, cause TA/RAs to multiple aircraft now you got the Feds attention. Get the point? You can discuss and argue many many many points of everyday flying from general aviation, to airliners, to corporate and there are many different rules and regulations out there that we all follow, or they are operation specific. What seems to be going on in this thread is more of lawyer talk and what would happen after the fact, like an accident, near mid-air, any event that would fit under the 91.13 regulation.

Ok here is the closet thing that come to a regulation since you want to seem to have proof of this....but take this with a grain of salt because the regulation is VAGUE it does not have a lot of specifics because of all the variables at different airports... Here is directly from FAR part 91.175

Yea about the flightaware aircraft type displayed... It must be a website error on a/c type because for ERJ 145 flights for example (for Chautauqua Airlines anyway)....all the time it seems they show up as E135 but I know for a fact they are E145 aircraft so not sure whats happening there!

Most correct post so far!