cmbaviator

I didn't said that it is in really life but the way the ground effect has been modelled with the B747 is very easy to land, at 100-50 fts, put yoke at neutral, the ground effect will reduce the V/S to -550-500 and you juste need to retard slowly the throttle at 30 fts and start pitching up slowly and here comes a greaser. For me itsd much harder to land the ixeg B737Cl than the B747, you can see that the pitch is less stable when entering into ground effect compared to a very stable pitch on the B747. that's why i just want to here a statement from a PMDG Devs. I flied the NGX a lot before the 737CL wnad it was the same thing, looks like there was no negative torque applied to the aircraft. If it's not implemented, it will be nice to have it ^^

IXEG has tweaked the xplane ground effect model so it should be pretty accurate. you can see that when i flare to the correct attitude (5°), the vertical speed is cut rapidly but then i need to hold some back pressure to try maintainning that attitude which is not the case in the B747 in my opinion, currently the B747 behaves the same but without the need to hold some back pressure (in order to maintain that pitch attitude). So i want to know form PMDG devs if they have modelled that negative torque or not and if not if they plan to do so.

Hi guys. Normally the ground effect has mainly 2 effects: * huge amount of lift created, therefore killing some vertical speed. I'm not used to heavy aircraft, been flying mainly the a320 and 737cl, it looks like this effect takes place around 200 feets agl (for the b747) until touch down. * negative torque. As the aircraft comes closer to the ground, a negative torque is applied on the aircraft, well, after 6-7 landing I haven't been able to feel that pitch decreasing, it only decreases when I retard the throttle between 30-40 fts agl. For me the first effect is greatly implemented but is the second effect implemented ? Or maybe it has marginal effect on a heavy aircraft like the b747?? With the IXEG 737cl on Xplane, you can really feel the need to maintain more back pressure to maintain your attitude when you are < 20 fts

I agree but i thibk that the vC graphics are under par

Thanks , would be nice to have some inputs fron 744 pilots

Is there someone willing to share his EZCA V2 view orofikr ? VC + exterior view would be awesome

Hi guys I was wondering how do you flare the V747-400?

My yoke is broken but ill use my joystick lol. Does the b747 mske a sound when trimming ?

Thank you for your input

Hi guys, I have a couple of questions where the answer will make me Buy or not: Firstly, what are the main differences between queen of the skies and II? As i only fly on Custom airport sceneries, with an average of 2000m of runway lenght. Can the 744D land on a 2000m runway ?? Miscellaneous questions. Is there a ezca 2.0 profile view yet? Custom PFPX Nd Topcat profile ? Pause at TD ? Performance compared to the fslabs A320X In advance, thanks Camille MB

I guess so, I'm downloading right now

Can we expect to have the Datalink feature in the future like the B777 ?

In P3D I have lower FPS, but more stable, I mean FPS are constantly between 27-28 FPS, there is less dispersion, not like FSX where i can get 20- 32 FPS

it was after Ap disconnection, but i've installed the 300ER and it seems more responsive than the 200LR

guys : My aircraft was in trim ( stable at 1000 feets RA) TRS on Vapp. My sensitivy is set so 10 % deflection on my yoke = 10 % deflection on b777's yoke

Hi guys. On my opinion, I think that the pitchrate is too slow : I have the saitek yoke proflight yoke with the axis assigned in FSUIPC with -16383/0/+16383 and 0 in slope and I have the b777's yoke has the same deflection as my Saitek. I really need to make so big input in order to make pitch attitude correction. but when watching video on youthe , pilots only make little correction and the plane responds well. I'll provide a video tommorow, will be easier to understand what i mean. CMB

I wish..........

ok thanks Will reisntall PMDG B777 then

Hi I got this message when I attempted to install fs2crew B777 https://www.dropbox.com/s/czr28eymsdic4jm/fsx2crew%20pmdg.png?dl=0 Quite weird isn't it ? CMB

ok thank you for the info, I've asked because p3D and p3DV2 are two differents products...

You mean p3Dv2 right ?

Ehhh, Didn't know about that, I opened windows speech recognition

Hi I did all the thing required for the speech recognition stated in the manual but after loading p3D2.4, when I say for example Before start Procedure, nothing happens it is like there is no co pilot at all. So this is what I did : * set to 8.0 ........US * train your computer to better understand you * set the FS2Crew voice control in the Aerosoft configurator * disable UAC * start speech recognition after loading p3DV2 then I launch the main panel. at this point everything works fine, but when I start to talk, nothing happens. I use a corsair headset with an integrated sound car (USB). CMB Well Did another try and it seems to work, don't know what I did wrong earlier

the thing I'm wondering, is that : Is it normal that after setting a new TRS, the plane will pitch agressively ?

Ok thanks. Please tell me if you agree with this as you've been on a LEVEL D T777 Sim : http://forum.avsim.net/topic/450359-t7-pitching-to-rapidly-after-changing-the-trim-reference-speed/