Jump to content

RoomyKestrel235

Members
  • Content Count

    18
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

6 Neutral

1 Follower

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Great news! I've enjoyed this plane as is, so this is all bonus. I'm assuming when they say navdata is custom database that means it does not use MSFS navdata. Is this correct? I don't have navigraph so I can only keep updated by using MSFS navdata.
  2. In the MSFS menu is the new SR22 labeled correctly? It appears to me as just the old SR22 with old specifications and not SR22T G6. I have the premium deluxe and SU14.
  3. I'm beginning to think this one won't see the light of day.
  4. Hopefully its soon. One of my favorite planes. Only complaint is I wish they made one of the more modern versions. But as long as they get the sounds right I'm good.
  5. Did this come out today? I know there were licensing issues. I hope this one doesn't get abandoned.
  6. Thank you for the responses. Is it possible to switch and use the MSFS navdata?
  7. Is it possible to use MSFS navdata for the Fenix A320? Thanks.
  8. The biggest question I have is are they going to fix the visible horizon line? If so, then MSFS2024 will be a new simulator with a new engine. If not, then it will be just an update. I think it will be the latter.
  9. You need to map a key to "PLUS" and "MINUS" also. I cannot remember off the top of my head if it's "SET HEADING BUG" or "SELECT HEADING BUG" first though. But the "PLUS" or "MINUS" changes the heading bug after it is set or selected.
  10. Yes they are. You may be using the old LOC 15 approach. Almost all the information one can find about aspen approaches have the old chart with old waypoints. That has been updated (not sure how long ago) and the new chart is very difficult to find. The waypoints from the new LOC 15 approach and RNAV RNP approach are in MSFS. You can enter these in but I believe they will all be treated as TF legs. You'll miss out on the DME arc stuff and the RF leg stuff.
  11. I have programmed and compiled the LOC 15, LOC-E, and the Honeywell RNAV (RNP) N 15 you write about for KASE. I have all the IAFs, RF legs, missed approach, altitude and speed constraints, and transitions in there as well. The RNP is a really cool approach as it brings you winding through the mountains including on the missed approach. All the waypoints are in MSFS so you don't need custom waypoints. You would just be missing the proper leg types. My plan is to upload them to flightsim.to after the WT avionics become default in January. I'm eager to share. It works really well right now on the G1000 but I wanted to wait until the other avionics are up to speed. I'm not part of the beta so I cannot test. If you want I can send zip file and you can just put this into your community folder.
  12. Exactly. Surprised we don't see more business jets/turboprops in development that will use WT avionics. Hopefully in the future this changes.
  13. Thanks for checking. I have programmed the LOC/DME-E and LOC/DME-15 into the simulator so I can load the approaches quickly into G1000/flight computer. I removed that folder from community folder and the localizer works down to runway. There must be something wrong with my custom approaches. Oh well... back to work.
  14. I've used both Nav/CDI and G1000. Always lose it. Kind of weird.
×
×
  • Create New...