RJPIC

For me I prefer FSL because of (IMO) a better flight model, weather radar, MELs. They still have a lot of work to do but I believe it will get better. Dont get me wrong Fenix is also a great product, visuals are superior, better performance (again IMO), fs2crew integration and the whole range of A32x aircraft with well simulated systems and failures model. For me as an airline pilot, FSL makes me feel at work, yesterday after loading my aircraft, I found a plane with a few MELs, no APU and the lovely yellow stickers on the overhead panel. I will continue supporting both products, I think some competition is good for us in the end

I agree with you, I believe the plane is flyable even though there is no VNAV (the CRJ I used to fly had no VNAV and we were perfectly fine without it, a bit more workload). It is a shame that certain virtual airlines are still not allowing the E-Jet on their platform though. I think this plane has come a long way and will continue to improve I am sure.

I ordered mine on 11/26 and to this date still have not received anything. I inquired with customer service and got the bs response "shipping after Christmas", still nothing 😞

There are a few things that Fenix doesnt have. The whole MEL thing is kinda unique, to my knowlege, there are no other products in the market doing that. It's pretty neat to see these yellow stickers in the cockpit, makes me feel at work lol. I would give the edge to FSL on the flight model, single engine characteristics feels right (I am not type rated in the 320 but have multiple other TRs and plenty of sim time in the bus). It is good to see competition in this market (I personally dont think the inibuild products are close to Fenix or FSL). John