Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Mac_Paint

Final Fantasy

Recommended Posts

Help AVSIM continue to serve you!
Please donate today!

That'll make the boys from Soviet Canuckistan happy :-)Bryan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The model just rocks, stunning, everything is right!!Best regards, Joey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>Looks GREAT, Pete...does Air Canada still operate them?No they don't, unfortunately :(!Regards, Joey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>Nice shots and paint Pete but what is the FPS hit of this one>because I see in the background one blurry mess ;-)FPS are of concern to me as well; I have a new hand built system but still only get single digit FPS on the ground with the 744X and AI at 80% (I use Ultimate Traffic X and REFUSE to remove AI traffic on the ground!)...so my fear is I will get the MD11 and just see the same ol' single digit FPS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, flew today with the PMDG 747X and the frames were pretty good, only it started to get weird when I landed. I slided all my sliders to the left by Autogen to none and I got a beast of a PC and it still stutters!!!! Anyway hopefully the MD11 will be better regarding the FPS, the systems will be no doubt if I read all those stories!Regards, Joey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris,you will see increased FPS on the MD-11 compared to the B744!But if you really want to improve FPS without reducing AI I'm afraid you'll need to dump Ultimate Traffic X and use hand-made traffic from the guys at Aardvark, Fruit Stand, AI Malcontent and so on.This is a tremendous amount of work, but you will get BETTER looking AI planes with better FPS.Regards,Markus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>Nice shots and paint Pete but what is the FPS hit of this one>because I see in the background one blurry mess ;-)>That's because he's zoomed way in, and you're seeing distant textures with the low LOD.RhettFS box: E8500 (@ 3.80 ghz), AC Freezer 7 Pro, ASUS P5E3 Premium, BFG 8800GTX 756 (nVidia 169 WHQL), 4gb DDR3 1600 Patriot Cas7 7-7-7-20 (2T), PC Power 750, WD 150gb 10000rpm Raptor, Seagate 500gb, Silverstone TJ09 case, Vista Ultimate 64ASX Client: AMD 3700+ (@ 2.6 ghz), 7800GT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>But if you really want to improve FPS without reducing AI I'm>afraid you'll need to dump Ultimate Traffic X and use>hand-made traffic from the guys at Aardvark, Fruit Stand, AI>Malcontent and so on.Dude that's a MAJOR PITA...not gonna happen for a few FPS increase.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>Dude that's a MAJOR PITA...not gonna happen for a few FPS>increase.Well it's more than just a 'few' FPS, talking big airports here. But it's not only FPS, but your AI will actually look REAL, which it does not with Ultimate Traffic X...But hey it's a free world... I know that I will never go back to an all-in-one package.Markus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>>Nice shots and paint Pete but what is the FPS hit of this>one>>because I see in the background one blurry mess ;-)>>>>That's because he's zoomed way in, and you're seeing distant>textures with the low LOD.>>>Rhett>Rhett I know what he is doing lol (hence I develop too ;))But I don't have that on my system ;-)So just curious what the FPS impact will be on approach (most important one for me ;-))Maybe some comparison with the 747X? which I have on my system...http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y156/awf1/sign.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites