Level-D 767-300 observation

[Guest EIDUB]

Hello,Not complaining and I could be wrong. With the title Level-D 767-300 it looks like we shall not see a 762, 752, 753 and more optimistically a 764 included in this package. In my opinion it

[G MIDY]

Possibly the 757/767 series but i doubt the 764 will be made as it is a different panel it more resembles a 777.G-MIDY :-scatter

[hopskip]

I'd like to see the 767-200, but more importantly, is some variants of the 767-300, including differing TCAS styles (on the VSI for one and the NDHSI for the other) and different engine variants (specificly the flight characteristics and display parameters (EPR instead of N1 etc) )this way we can more accuratley model different airlines which have these other options.so my ideal 767 would be a bit like the PMDG -800/900 as far as options, but of course be a 767.I like how theyv kept the basic panel pretty much the same (nice First Officer panel though! and nice to see TCAS on the ND also!)Can't wait to buy it :D

[Dillon]

Let's keep throwing a bug in their ear and maybe we'll at lest see some integration with the posky models (clickable VC included). These two aircraft series have the same flight decks meaning it's not like we're asking for a 767/777 update here.

[Guest SvenAelterman]

I am afraid that it's a little bit more complicated than that... Consider the changes required to the FMC to calculate weights and speeds.Also see http://www.757.org.uk/767/diff/HTHSven.

[Guest sidewinder]

I think the Level-D team want to provide users with an accurate simulation of one particular model. Perhaps there are so many differences between variants that modelling all of them can be a difficult and time consuming task, so they would rather concentrate on one specific model.-Alex

[Guest EIDUB]

Hi guys,I understand the argument that they want to concentrate on one product at a time to make a perfect package. However I think that these guys are extremely talented at what they do and it would not be out of their grasp to append a 762,752... and all the variants and specifications onto the product specification. In saying that it may not be what they are looking to accomplish with this package and they may yet grace us with all the 757 and 767 variants in the future, which I would be happy to pay for. I do think that it would be for Level-D's benefit to recognize FS communities desire for aircraft such as the 757 and 764 models.Here's hoping,Stephen

[hopskip]

Just thought of something...Remember how PMDG released the 737-600/700 and then later the 737-800/900...I would ceartainly buy an updated Level D Simulations 757-200 which 'required' the 767-300 to be installed already, ala PMDG 737-800.

[Brian Doney]

^^^me 2.

[Guest emti01]

Hi all,I have found this interesting link:http://www.pic767flyingclub.com/index3.htmlBest regardsMichael (BAW686)http://www.emti01.gmxhome.de/BAVIII.jpg

[Guest BillVC]

Where?

[ACA857]

IF the new 767 carries 160,000lbs of fuel, then we are talking about an "ER" version with some "desktop variances" i.e. 4th Hyd system, ETOPS stuff, etc. which will not affect your sim experience. The non-ER carries only about 112,000lbs of fuel and MTOW of about 50,000lbs less than the "ER".Rob.

[Guest Skedflyer]

The 767-400 is a whole different ball of wax... it would need a completely new cockpit you cannot just port 763 into a 764. Not just an add-on but a completely new package.http://www.airliners.net/open.file/112994/M/

[Guest BillVC]

The 764 is a great aircraft. To do one would be great for home cockpit builders. Easier then steam guages.

[Guest gremel]

Try dumping the everything after .com and you'll have the site in question.Regards,jack