September 1, 200718 yr Hi everyone, im sure this has been asked many a times before, but i cant find it anywhere, so I apologize even before the question lol.I was just wondering, I have the flight1 super 80, havn't used it much at all, but i was wondering if the maddog is any diffrent then the flight 1 version, Are they both pretty much on the same level?Thanks. Intel I7 12700KF / 32 GB Ram-3600mhz / Windows 11 - 64 bit / NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060TI / 32" Acer Monitor, Honeycomb alpha/bravo, CH rudder pedals, Tobii 5, Buttkicker, Logitech radio panel.
September 1, 200718 yr No, they are not.I have both and the Maddog2006 is way, way ahead of the Super 80, both system wise as the flight model.They really cannot be compared.The only grief I have with MD2006 are sometimes the faulty SID/STAR procedure files causing troubles Location: Vleuten, The Netherlands, 17.3dme SPL 108.40 | Simulator: FS2024 System: AMD 7800X3D - Gigabyte X670 - RTX 4090 - 64GB DDR5 - 2 x 2TB SSD - 32" 1440p Display - Windows 11 Pro
September 1, 200718 yr I started with the Iron Knuckles DC9 then the Super80 and now Maddog 2006. And I agree, there is no comparison. The Maddog has the same meticulous attention to system accuracy and fidelity as LevelD, PMDG, RFP, Flight1's ATR and DreamFleet. You can fly the Maddog with airline checklist and procedures. The control panel adds instructor type oversight/control relative to ground functions and malfunctions. The addition of a VC will put the Maddog in the top five best commercial jets available IMHO. Bob.. Bob Prince
September 2, 200718 yr Agree with both gentlemen. It really is one of the best.Have both and took the Super 80 off. Never was able to get the Super 80 to work without OOM errors. Gerald EAA #: 1317747 i7 8700K 6-Core 3.7GHz (4.5GHz); ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I Gaming ; RTX 2070 Super Turbo 8GB; 32GB G.Skill TridentZ 3000MHz; 250GB Samsung 960 Evo PCIe NVMe M.2; 2x 500GB Samsung 850 Evo Series SSD; 1TB WD Black HDD; Win10 Pro 64; P3D 4.5
September 3, 200718 yr I have both add-ons and BOTH work wonderfully!If you're an FMC-kinda guy, the go for the Maddog (but get the Jet City Aircraft models.. the Maddog model is horrible!)Since the Maddog doesn't have a VC, it doesn't really matter... but visually, the Maddog model is poorly modeled.If you like a more "hands-on" navigation experience, then stick with the Super80! The performance is smooth and the external model with VC is beautifully done! The training/dispatch center is a very nice, helpful feature too!I like them both and use them both often... I'm not one of the "Coke/Pepsi" simmers... I tend to like each product for its own merits and not because of blind loyalty. Some people don't like the Maddog because they find the FMC too complicated, thus they say it's a bad product.. likewise, some people don't know how to fly WITHOUT an FMC, therefore they dimiss the Super80 as being a bad product. As an 8000+ hour REAL WORLD pilot with several thousand hours of turbine time, I can tell you that BOTH products are pretty realistic (within the limits of FS9)Each one of these products has excellent features and good performance... they also both have drawbacks. It all boils down to YOUR preference for systems/cockpit style.- Alex
Create an account or sign in to comment