Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
HoratioWondersocks

Circle to land question

Recommended Posts

Hello AllOn a flt last night HECA-LTBA i was requested by ATC to descend to x and expect vectors ILS rwy 27 circle to land rwy 9.Now I have come across these circle to land apps before but rarely, it seems that 98 percent of FS apps are ILS or visual.I know what is required ie I approached as normal ILS 27 but carried on that course obviously not landing 27 but preparing to circle entering right traffic to land rwy9.I have been doing 'normal' ILS apps for years so i am no novice,but the one thing I have yet to do is a backcourse approach and my question is this.....Is this circle to land approach something to do with a backcourse approach?I did have a fiddle with the backcourse and approach buttons as i passed over the airport preparing to land rwy9,but didn't really know what I was doing so in the end I just settled for disconnecting the autopilot and doing the whole thing by hand(fortunately my manual flying is pretty good now)and made a good landing on rwy9.Was I right to do the procedure manually or are circle to land approaches something to do with using the backcourse button?As I usually say..If that lot makes any sense please can you help.I do like to do things in an accurate as manor possible rather than just guessing.Cheers AndyPS I have got to get that circle to land rwy x SIDESTEP rwy y app sorted as well sometime too,.but will leave that for another day. :(


photo-141290.gif?_r=1341161573?t=54318216?t=43542077

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Circle to land, backcourse and sidestep approaches are an economical way to provide more approaches to an airport without the need for added equipment. These are sometimes called non-aligned approaches. Their purpose is to get you below the clouds so you can make a visual landing on a more wind favorable runway. They will have higher minimums than an ILS.In a circle to land you would descend along the ILS until either 1) you reach the decision height without seeing the runway and go missed approach or 2) you can report the runway in sight and break off the ILS and enter a standard traffic pattern. If at any time you loose sight of the runway in the pattern you would declare a missed approach and follow the published procedure.Hope this clears it up a bit.Joe


The best gift you can give your children is your time.

sigbar.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello AllOn a flt last night HECA-LTBA i was requested by ATC to descend to x and expect vectors ILS rwy 27 circle to land rwy 9.Now I have come across these circle to land apps before but rarely, it seems that 98 percent of FS apps are ILS or visual.I know what is required ie I approached as normal ILS 27 but carried on that course obviously not landing 27 but preparing to circle entering right traffic to land rwy9.I have been doing 'normal' ILS apps for years so i am no novice,but the one thing I have yet to do is a backcourse approach and my question is this.....Is this circle to land approach something to do with a backcourse approach?I did have a fiddle with the backcourse and approach buttons as i passed over the airport preparing to land rwy9,but didn't really know what I was doing so in the end I just settled for disconnecting the autopilot and doing the whole thing by hand(fortunately my manual flying is pretty good now)and made a good landing on rwy9.Was I right to do the procedure manually or are circle to land approaches something to do with using the backcourse button?As I usually say..If that lot makes any sense please can you help.I do like to do things in an accurate as manor possible rather than just guessing.Cheers AndyPS I have got to get that circle to land rwy x SIDESTEP rwy y app sorted as well sometime too,.but will leave that for another day. :(
Hello Andy,If it's LTBA that's concerned then it's RWY 06-24. :( I assume you were not flying IFR to get a circle to land instruction. Did you request another approach or runway? This is certainly very interesting. In real life you would be manually flying that procedure anyway, while keeping an eye on the instruments. This approach isn't available for LTBA, I think it was in the past though. It is available for LTFJ, the second airport in Istanbul.Joe's post sums up what I know about circle -to-land and backcourse approaches, the latter as a reference when the runway only has an ILS signal in one direction. Modern airliners don't have backcourse modes so I guess it isn't used that much anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello Andy,If it's LTBA that's concerned then it's RWY 06-24. :( I assume you were not flying IFR to get a circle to land instruction. Did you request another approach or runway? This is certainly very interesting. In real life you would be manually flying that procedure anyway, while keeping an eye on the instruments. This approach isn't available for LTBA, I think it was in the past though. It is available for LTFJ, the second airport in Istanbul.Joe's post sums up what I know about circle -to-land and backcourse approaches, the latter as a reference when the runway only has an ILS signal in one direction. Modern airliners don't have backcourse modes so I guess it isn't used that much anymore.
Apologies to you.In my original post i said LTBA, it should have been OSAP( Aleppo)

photo-141290.gif?_r=1341161573?t=54318216?t=43542077

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The commonly used localizer antenna today uses the log-periodic design. In this design most of the RF energy is on the frontcourse side of the antenna. Thus, there isn't much reason to try to certify the backcourse for use as a directional aid. There is a significant number of circling approaches with names such as VOR A, VOR B, GPS Z, etc.scott s..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Circle to land, backcourse and sidestep approaches are an economical way to provide more approaches to an airport without the need for added equipment. These are sometimes called non-aligned approaches. Their purpose is to get you below the clouds so you can make a visual landing on a more wind favorable runway. They will have higher minimums than an ILS.In a circle to land you would descend along the ILS until either 1) you reach the decision height without seeing the runway and go missed approach or 2) you can report the runway in sight and break off the ILS and enter a standard traffic pattern. If at any time you loose sight of the runway in the pattern you would declare a missed approach and follow the published procedure.Hope this clears it up a bit.Joe
Thanks for your input Joe.You have cleared up some points for me.I will have to look into this subject in more detail though.cheers Andy

photo-141290.gif?_r=1341161573?t=54318216?t=43542077

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...