Hi,It seems like RC4 does not recognize LIMC addon scenery after DB rebuilding. The problem is very similar to what RC previously had with Flightscenery KPDX and KPVD. My initial thought was that custom-made ILS's in main scenery folder may intefere with RC Rebuilder. I disabled these ils-files and rebuiled scenery again, but had no luck at all - LIMC is not visible by RC4 and there is no such airport as LIMC in runways.xls file.Your help would be much appreciated.ThanksDmitriy

Hi,It seems like RC4 does not recognize LIMC addon scenery after DB rebuilding. The problem is very similar to what RC previously had with Flightscenery KPDX and KPVD. My initial thought was that custom-made ILS's in main scenery folder may intefere with RC Rebuilder. I disabled these ils-files and rebuiled scenery again, but had no luck at all - LIMC is not visible by RC4 and there is no such airport as LIMC in runways.xls file.Your help would be much appreciated.ThanksDmitriy

what version of makerwys.exe is in the root directory of fs?

Solved. It was an error in AFCAD that shows both runways with 800ft lenght. AFAIK Makerunways cannot recognizes such lenght as an attribute of valid runway. I changed to lenght to normal one and my problem was fixed.Thank you

Solved. It was an error in AFCAD that shows both runways with 800ft lenght. AFAIK Makerunways cannot recognizes such lenght as an attribute of valid runway. I changed to lenght to normal one and my problem was fixed.Thank you

the new one does. what version do you have?

the new one does. what version do you have?

4.4.1. Any reason to upgrade for a new one?

the new one does. what version do you have?

Does it? I don't remember that we ever agreed to remove the runway length restriction? It's still checking for > 1500 (metres I think).RegardsPete

That's a little long long for rejection. With RC5 expected to do VFR you'll find runways much shorter than 1500 meters.The pseudo runways used in the "crosswind" or "star" workaround (to make non-parallel runways capable of being simultaneously active) are typically less than 1200 feet. I thought that was the limit. Its been too long :)Of course heliports and pads are special cases. Never thought of that.

Does it? I don't remember that we ever agreed to remove the runway length restriction? It's still checking for > 1500 (metres I think).RegardsPete

That's a little long long for rejection. With RC5 expected to do VFR you'll find runways much shorter than 1500 meters.

Someone needs to make a proposal for a change then. It's always been 1500 metres by agreement here. No one mentioned any VFR to me and no other user application is needing them either as far as I can tell, unless they would be if they had them. ;-)

Of course heliports and pads are special cases. Never thought of that.

Heliports and water runways are also eliminated at present. Not sure what RC will do with a heliport -- does it have an orientation?RegardsPete

I'll propose it to the beta group then.Helicopters at some controlled airports have a pad near each end of a runway threshold. This reduces the distance required to "taxi" to the runway so they take-off briefly along a runway path along with fixed wing aircraft to preserve traffic flow at low altitudes I would imagine.At controlled airports you'll find applications like collocated military equipment and medivac facililities that some users would prefer to emulate. Medivac aircraft could certainly have to fly in IFR conditions also at least for part of a route.Regarding length, 1500 meters equals about 4900 feet and there are some controlled airports with runways of that distance. Looking at an r4.csv I see lengths of 1600 (your readme says it is feet) so we are probably fine with that. I checked it against afcad for 00IS and it matches at 1600 feet. It is a private farm strip. So if it ain't broke . . . :)

Someone needs to make a proposal for a change then. It's always been 1500 metres by agreement here. No one mentioned any VFR to me and no other user application is needing them either as far as I can tell, unless they would be if they had them. ;-)Heliports and water runways are also eliminated at present. Not sure what RC will do with a heliport -- does it have an orientation?RegardsPete

Regarding length, 1500 meters equals about 4900 feet and there are some controlled airports with runways of that distance. Looking at an r4.csv I see lengths of 1600 (your readme says it is feet) so we are probably fine with that. I checked it against afcad for 00IS and it matches at 1600 feet. It is a private farm strip. So if it ain't broke . . . :)

Ah, I only briefly looked at the code and saw the 1500. Maybe it is feet then. The BGLs contain metres but i probably convert it to feetduing the scanning.Pete