October 26, 201114 yr Author Well, I´ve got the payware and I can say that this SGA plane is much more appealing than the CLS! That does not surprise me. When I post screenshots of Vistaliners 727-200F ADV, they thought it was Captain Sim. When I post screenshots of POSKY 757-200, they thought it was Quality Wing. When I post screenshots of Vistaliners L-1011, they thought it was Aerosim. Remember the key to success in making freeware add-on planes look payware quality is SUPERB PAINTS. or SUPERB LIVERIES.Aharon
October 26, 201114 yr Commercial Member She certainly is an eyecatcher KROSWYND a.k.a KILO_WHISKEYMajestic Software Development/Support Sys 1: AMD 7950X3D, NOCTUA D15S, Gigabyte Elite B650, MSI 4090, 64Gb Ram, Corsair 850 Power Supply, 2x2TB M.2 Samsung 980s, 1x4TB WDD M.2, 6xNoctua 120mm case fans, LG C2 55" OLED running at 120Hz for the monitor, Win11. Sys 2: i7 8700k, MSI GAMING MBoard, 32Gigs RAM, MSI 4070Ti & EVGA 1080Ti. Hardware: Brunner CLS-E-NG Yoke, Fulcrum One yoke, TM TPR Rudder Pedals, Yoko TQ6+ NEO, StreamDeck, Tobii Eye Tracker, Virpil VPC MongoosT-50CM3 Base with a TM gripSIMULATORS: MSFS2020/XP12/P3D v5.4 & v6: YouTube Videos
October 26, 201114 yr That does not surprise me. When I post screenshots of Vistaliners 727-200F ADV, they thought it was Captain Sim. When I post screenshots of POSKY 757-200, they thought it was Quality Wing. When I post screenshots of Vistaliners L-1011, they thought it was Aerosim.Remember the key to success in making freeware add-on planes look payware quality is SUPERB PAINTS. or SUPERB LIVERIES.AharonYeah but what´s with the inner values. All of these models you´re talking about are great to look at but rather complicated to fly cause it´s not easy to find a neat panel or even one plane with VC. So I have to go payware to get that all together. Best regards, Steffen Fight time: NGX 737-700: 37,0h; -800: 47,2h
Create an account or sign in to comment