Is this true? I didn't see a link to a source. While I'm happy to know if it indeed is true, why would they support FS2004 when 737NGX is FSX only?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PMDG

Since Wikipedia can be edited by any number of people I have strong doubts to that remark. PMDG has announced there is not really much left to squeeze out of FS 2004 market wise. Even though I can't link to it, I know PMDG has made several hints that any future additions will only be available for FSX. Cheers, Nate

Completely false - FSX only.

Carriage...horse...and so on....

obviously fair usage

obviously fair usage

:D

Wikipedia.. or best possible misinformation. :)

Eh...you have to give the site credit. Most of the wikipedia articles with any well-known content (e.g.: not niche market information, like gaming and simming), get more peer review on average than does the Encyclopoedia Brittanica. Furthermore, you need only glance down at the references to check credibility.There exists a large problem out there in the world:Too many blindly accept, and too many blindly dismiss. Educate yourself, but carefully.

There are many other issues with wikipedia, for example, a group of editors can gang up and hijack an article so it reads what they want according to their own agenda (example, the Myanmar article is named Burma)

And the editors of the Encyclopoedia Brittanica couldn't (don't) do the same? There's a political agenda behind just about anything.

I went in to look at the link and saw the error and then went in to update it but someone beat me to it while I was looking :)One of the things I do is check out the resource links to go directly to the information.In my experience I have found information especially regarding airports and airlines accurate most of the time. It is handy for airport terminal assignments by airline and airline destination.For airlines I like to look at their current fleets.