Why do we need two topics on this?

Because 'this' is very special. Don't you see !??Just wait and i'll start another ! :Party:cheers,jan

Wrong, at least as far as I'm concerned. Based on my age alone, I'm certainly not the typical gamer with a somewhat secondary, passing interest in aviation. I wouldn't hold a real-world pilot's license if it were so.I just don't happen to be overly enthusiastic about anything vintage. If I want to fly old stuff, I can go to my local flying club. They've got a nice assortment of old russian fighters, biplanes, and what not.As for the PC simulation, I'm more interested in learning about the multi-million-dollar computerized stuff that is flown in todays commercial world and which I personally will probably never get my hands on.But that's just me.Anyway, denying anyone who doesn't stand frozen in awe when spotting a DC-6 or other relic of that time the title of "aviation nut" is a litlte presumptuous ;)

I never said it was a "rule". Simply an observation that I can almost substantiate.Anyway; as a true aviation nut, I can tell you that just about every facet of aviation piques my interest. VFR, IFR, 121, 91, big, small, new, old, slow, fast... The fact that I get even more excited over "relics" of the past (which pioneered everything we have today) is understandable as --again-- I'm a true aviation nut. Not only do get excited about and show respect to the "old junk", I fantasize flying it! If the smell alone of the inside of an old, vintage (the word I want you to use from now on) aircraft doesn't get you worked up, I question your "aviation nuttiness".BTW, I'm very presumptuous! You must be relatively new here!

Loved the post. Spot on!

Edited February 13, 201214 yr by ZachLW

You must be relatively new here!

Sorry, but I can't stop thinking about this...

BTW, I'm very presumptuous! You must be relatively new here!

I thought that was my job... :(