Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone. I have a system with i7 2600k (not overclocked), 8Gb RAM and a Nvidia GT530 video card. My question is should I upgrade to GTX550-Ti video card? Do you think it would improve my fps even to some extent? Basically the only thing I do with this desktop is run fsx so other aspects concerning the video card can be ignored.

 

Thanks in advance!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

short answer - NO. Long answer - NO - GPU's really don't make that much impact on FPS in FSX - CPU power is what is needed. And going from the 530 to 550 is just a waste of $$. Later this year when the next generation of 6 series cards is available, you *might* see some improvement but whether or not the improvement vs the cost is worth it - only you can tell.

 

Save your $$ and overclock the I2600 - you will definitely see an improvement there.

 

Vic


 

RIG#1 - 7700K 5.0g ROG X270F 3600 15-15-15 - EVGA RTX 3090 1000W PSU 1- 850G EVO SSD, 2-256G OCZ SSD, 1TB,HAF942-H100 Water W1064Pro
40" 4K Monitor 3840x2160 - AS16, ASCA, GEP3D, UTX, Toposim, ORBX Regions, TrackIR
RIG#2 - 3770K 4.7g Asus Z77 1600 7-8-7 GTX1080ti DH14 850W 2-1TB WD HDD,1tb VRap, Armor+ W10 Pro 2 - HannsG 28" Monitors
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to disagree. The GT 530 is a rather anemic card, even FSX can make more use of the GPU than the GT 530 can provide. Certainly this is true with an i7 2600k. In fact, if you can swing something faster than a 550 I would recommend it also. A 560 is a fine card. If you can wait, the 660 will be out in the next few weeks and should be even better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes ..the 530 is a weak card and vs the 550ti there is no contest. However just yesterday Aug 17, 2012 the GTX 660ti line is available for around $300. While it is true that FSX is CPU intensive and more so than GPU intensive..however that is not license to disregard an appropriate graphics card upgrade. I had a 550ti installed in my FSX box and got 6.4 on Windows Experience and replaced it with a 560ti w/448 Cudas (around $300 then) and the Windows Experience for gaming and graphics went from 6.4 to the max of 7.9. The improvement in FSX was dramatic. In Manhattan and London iitis tuff sledding for most of us.

 

Cloud settings are a big hit so you could try reducing them in FSX...but I have to say when I got half-way decent hardware and went with HDMI video card output and HD monitor what a tremendous plus...I run my clouds maxed out and it's a beautiful thing. My home airport is KLAS (Las Vegas.NV) and get 40fps + flying downtown "Sin City" around 25 fps in Manhattan but there are so many variables FPS comparisons are generally pointless IMHO

 

Happy Landings... :rolleyes:

 

-ps I always use real weather (which changes) but on a clear day in Manhattan it's 40+ BUT forget FPS obsession..if it is a smooth flight and you are adequately "immersed" then that's IT! Right? B)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...