Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'fps'.
-
Hi everyone, sorry to be THIS guy...but I'm out of ideas. I've watched several NGX videos on youtube, and it seems like they all have it dialed in, and I cant get mine to perform like theirs. I'm talking about choppy animations, like, way choppy animations. i.e speedbreaks, ailerons, etc.. I dont accept the results I'm getting. My system should handle NGX. I know its a heavy addon, but comparing other peoples systems, and seeing how it runs on them, I should be getting comperable results..or maybe not, I'm still new to this world... 3770k @ 4.7, 8GB corsair vengance ram 9-9-9-24, GTX680, samsung SSD. someone please help me out here... Thanks.
-
This is a forum of my findings with testing FSX and CrossfireX. My system: OS: Windows 7 x64 CPU: i7-980 3.33ghz Ram: 16 GB Sniper 1866 SSD: 250 GB Samsung 840, 2 X OCZ 60 GB HDD: 1 TB Hitachi, 1 Samsung HD105SI CD/DVD Drive: HP CDDVDW GPU: 2 X Radeon HD 7850 2GB OC'd to 1050, 1400 FSX with Crossfire with Bojote tweak tool: Settings: [Graphics] Fram Rate: Unlimited Resolution: 1920x1080 Anisotropic: On Anti-aliasing: Checked Global Texture: Very High Lens Flare: Check Advanced Animations: Check [Aircraft] Default View: 3-D virtual cockpit High Res: Check Aircraft Lights Illum Ground: Check [scenery] LOD: Large Mesh com: 75 Mesh res: 5m Texture res: 15cm Water effects: Low 2.x Scenery com: Extreme Autogen den: Dense Special effects: High [Weather] Cloud Draw: 60mi Cloud Detail: Detaild and maximum Downloads Winds Aloft: Check Rate of Change: Medium [Traffic] All 0 and Labels Off [sound] All 50 Results: Ultra Light and Friday Harbor (in air): 38-60 Ultra Light and Friday Harbor (on ground): 34-50 Ultra Light and KLAX (FsDreamteam {in air}): 30-40 Ultra Light and KLAX (FsDreamteam {on ground}): 25-45 NGX and KLAX (FsDreamteam {in air}): 14-18 NGX and KLAX (FsDreamteam {on ground}): 14-16 Now the major jumps in fps on some results is because I panned around the VC and those were the averages. FSX without CFX: Same Settings and CFG as before. Results: Ultra Light and Friday Harbor (in air): 40-50 Ultra Light and Friday Harbor (on ground): 40-80 Ultra Light and KLAX (in air): 34-54 Ultra Light and KLAX (on ground): 38-60 NGX and KLAX (in air): 20-30 NGX and KLAX (on ground): 25-40 I forgot to mention that I have ORBX, REX Essential, and ASE installed and running while doing these tests.
-
Hi, I have a problem with aerosoft and flytampa scenery like amsterdam,frankfurt and flytampa midway.... I usually fly in my airbus x or ngx at around 30 to 35 at big airports like vienna =flytampa= i can get 20 25 fps easy but airports like frankfurt or amsterdam frames drop to 15 and amsterdam like 10 fps I have all tweaks and service packs applied I know that frankfurt is very heavy on fps but in fs9 using ifly 737 I can get 35 fps with the same scenery but in fsx its just awful, is there some way i can raise fps at aerosoft airports like maybe some sort of scenery tweak or somthing just so that i can recieve better fps at big airports made by aerosoft also madrid is a good example all sceney sliders in middle and i tried to put autogen density to sparse still low fps Im sure its not autogen scenery its the frankfurt airport itself that causes low fps also my traffic and airline traffic are 0 Pc specs core i7 2600 3.5 Ghz 8gb ddr3 RAM GTX550ti thanks for reading and i hope someone can help and before you comment saying use the tweaking tool i already did and also added some other tweaks like poolsize=0 and some other ones
-
HY GUYS I JUST JOIN AND I NEED SOME HELP WITH MY FSX IV JUST DID A FRESH INSTALL OF WIN 7 HOME EDITION,AND THE FSX,IV ALSO ADD A FEW AIRPORTS(WELL QUITE A FEW) FEW AIRCRAFTS AND OTHER BITS AND WEN I RUN THE FSX WITH THE PMDG 747 OR THE OTHER A/C IN A INSTALLED AIRPORT I CAN ONLY GET BETWEEN 5 TO 8 FPS MY PC SPECS ARE AS FOLLOW I7 920@ 2.67 OVERCLOCKED TO 3.57 GTX 680 12GB DOMINATOR GT ASUS RAMPAGE 2 EXTREME 300GB VELOCIRAPTOR AND STILL GOES SLOW I DONT KNOW WHAT ELSE TO DO,CAN YOU GUYS GIVE ME ANY TIPS THANK YOU BELOW A PIC OF MY MACHINE
-
Hi! I'd like to use FPS limiter, but there is a problem. I've created a bat file (fsx.exe.limited) but when I double click it it doesn't start FSX. Only small dos window appears for a sec and then disappears. I've tried with all three options D3D9, OGL, D3D8 but nothing works. I've selected fsx.exe file by clicking search button, I have win 7 32, Java,.... I just don't know what's wrong. Is there an alternative to FPS Limiter?
-
Hi, I'm gonna start by listing my specs bellow, but I am having issues with performance. Windows 7 Intel® Core™ 2 Duo CPU @ 2.53GHz 4060mb RAM ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500/5100 series (512mb, GDDR3) CPU load averages 60-70% when running FS9 FS9 uses around 500mb memory, peaking to 3gb total RAM usage As of late, even with all the sliders turned down I am getting under 20fps at default airports. My PC is only about 2-3 years old, and I would assume it could run FS9 quite decently. I have had this issue for a few months now, I don't remember what I was getting before, but I could run pretty high AI at EGLL with FPS above 25 (although I don't usually use AI because of VATSIM flying). If you could assist me in maybe some tweaks I could add into my FS9.cfg (I have already done some, but I'm no expert in that field) or anything else that could be done to increase performance. Help is much appreciated
-
Hi Guys, I'm a bit disappointed because I though I had a solution to my frame per second limitation with max graphical details. Actually I run an i7 3770K overclocked at 4.4GHz on a Win7 64b. The X-plane I run is a 10.20rc2 version. Actually my central CPU was running under 50% of load and around 2GB of central RAM among the 8 installed. I had a GF 560GTX TI graphical card that seemed to be a bottleneck with its 1GB of DDR3 VRAM because when running GPU-Z the GPU load wasn't at the maximum but the memory was saturated -> low fps on big sceneries. I also run latest NVidia driver 314.07. So I installed instead a GF 660GTX TI with 3GB of VRAM and I can't really see the difference :( GPU-Z confirms that I'm on PCI-e 3.0 x16. Now, with all this stuff nothing seem to be saturated (neither the CPU with its memory nor the GPU with its VRAM) and, even that, I have low fps like on this screenshot at Orly with win7 gadgets showing the figures :( I have these low fps when I aim on the direction of Paris with its high number of buildings. when I aim to the runway the number increases to 50/60 fps. What do you think I have missed to make both memories and CPU/GPU resources used as it should and then increase my fps in general ? Thanks for any feedback :lol: -
Hi All, I have been stopping myself to post a message in the forum hoping I could do something about my framerate in FSX by myself but I have not managed to do that. So here I am ! Here are my specs : I7 930 overclocked to 4ghz. 12GB ram GTX 480 (Asus). ASUS P6TX58 Addons : PMDG 737 (obviously ) REX overdrive (no essentials) Active Sky 2012 ORBX YMML (for the test) ENB Series (I have issue with that one. I can fly using it but I get black screen when I access the menu/use replay etc.. especially when I fly in high details area/by night or other stressing situation for the computer) FPS Limiter (same as above, I suspect it's coming from the d9d3.dll and my graphic card, they don't like each other so I tend to deactive both of them). I deleted the FSX.cfg and use the online tool (Venetubo) and that's about it. I've also used Nvidia inspector and use the 4S configuration. (for anti aliasing and anisotropic selected in FSX, framerate unlimited) Frame rate at YMML on active runway : 15-18fps. Autogen : normal My first question is : is that a common framerate ? If yes, well too bad for me I might need another machine. if no, is there anyone with pretty much the same config that could share some tips with me ? I love this plane and would like to enjoy it as much as it deserves it. That would be much appreciated. Thank you and let me know if you need more info. Sylvain.
-
Hi, People will be able to help me? I use rex when i put a little of cloud´s i have jumps on the video or low fps, :angry: :angry: In the rex i have the next config ir you lock the image. In the Fsx config i have the low options for wheater Mi Grapics gard Ati HD 6770. Thanks for your help!!!!...............
-
Hi everyone im new to this forum so... i will introduce myself hehehe, my name is Fernando, im 20 years old and im from Venezuela, i fly regularly in Flight Simulator X with the PMDG 737NGX and Jetstream 41, and now i recently installed an old software i had around which was originally developed for FS9 but adapted to FSX, its the Fly The Maddog by Leonardo SH but i noticed that in comparison to PMDG's 737NGX the Maddog has very but veeery low frame rates (around 5 FPS) with everything low in the setup tab within the configuration manager, in fact it happens with almost every aircraft which was originally developed for FS9 and adapted for FSX, for example the F1's superb ATR 72-500 the panel graphics and virtual cockpit model is very frame rate friendly in FS9 but after i used the FSX updater to migrate it from fs2004 and tried to make a flight with it i simply couldnt, frame rates were veery low (again, 5-6 fps), it also happened with Majestic's Dash 8 but every other aircraft like the Super 80 professional for fsx had a frame rate of 20+ fps, any idea of why is this happening? please help, sometimes its very frustrating because the most realistic addons are fs9 based aircraft.. Thank you in advance! My specs are: Intel i3 2.26Ghz clock Nvidia 310M Video card 4GB Ram 500GB Hard disk Please take note that in most FSX-based aircraft i have very good performance (like 20+ fps) so i know my setup is fairly good enough for FSX within my pocket size lol.
-
Hi, I will like to share experiences on overclocked processors you have, the impact on fps on FSX, specs and recommendations for a stable overclocking, which vendors should I thrust? I saw ava direct, Origin, cyberpower, digital storms, Ironside, etc on USA but no one seems to have experience on FSX and also found comments quiestioning their reliability overclocking over 4,5 GHz. Please help me decide!! -
Hi, does any of you have any tips of how to improve fsx frames per second??? i´m really crazy about this, because when flying with the pmdg 737 NGX in a default airport i get no more than 11 fps inside the cockpit. BUT, when flying and into an aerosoft airport, such as zurich, i never exceed 7 frames per second inside the cockpit. Thanks, tatin 98
-
Hey guys, I am currently running an i5 3570k @ 4.4ghz and getting around 25 - 30 FPS on the ground / low altitudes and well into the 40's in the air. My question is if I overclock to a higher GHz, will the performance increase? My PC Specs are as follows ... i5 3570k @4.4 GHz currently sitting around 63 degrees celcius on 100% load. EVGA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost @ 1200 MHz 8 GB Corsair 1600 MHz RAM Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO 600w CX600M Corsair Power Supply I am using FSX Acceleration pack and the addons I run are REX+, PMDG 737NGX, Airbus X Extended, UTX, and some airport scenery addons. I am looking to pick up Ground Services X and I have heard that was pretty frame rate intensive so I wanted to make sure I could run it before I bought it. I do fly on VATSIM sometimes so the traffic sometimes lowers FPS as well. My fsx.cfg is tweaked pretty well I would say so there isn't much improvement there. Also, would overclocking the ram add any improvement? Thanks for any help, Preston -
Hey guys, I am currently running an i5 3570k @ 4.4ghz and getting around 25 - 30 FPS on the ground / low altitudes and well into the 40's in the air. My question is if I overclock to a higher GHz, will the performance increase? My PC Specs are as follows ... i5 3570k @4.4 GHz currently sitting around 63 degrees celcius on 100% load. EVGA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost @ 1200 MHz 8 GB Corsair 1600 MHz RAM Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO 600w CX600M Corsair Power Supply I am using FSX Acceleration pack and the addons I run are REX+, PMDG 737NGX, Airbus X Extended, UTX, and some airport scenery addons. I am looking to pick up Ground Services X and I have heard that was pretty frame rate intensive so I wanted to make sure I could run it before I bought it. I do fly on VATSIM sometimes so the traffic sometimes lowers FPS as well. My fsx.cfg is tweaked pretty well I would say so there isn't much improvement there. Also, would overclocking the ram add any improvement? Thanks for any help, Preston
-
is it just me or is the dash 8 q400 actually increasing frame rates in fsx! with this aircraft i get better frame rates than even when using the default trike. scenery used - orbx khqm. new tech rules!
-
Hello everyone! Just so everyone knows, I am aware that if im using all those addons ill be getting bad fps but not as bad as i thought. So i just got accepted into Qantas Virtual so ill be doing my flying in Australia, and who better for scenery than ORBX?! So I load up P3D, select YBBN (Brisbane, with all patches and I have taken out all the major FPS killers in the control panel except for PeopleFlow.) and I load up my 737. My FPS during the day time is only at 20 at the gate with the plane systems on! Now ill give you a series of tweaks that i did to my CFG file and system specs, also, should I turn the the resolution on the 737? Will it look really bad? Used Bojotes tweak tool for fsx, For the bufferpools i replaced their number with 0, and i also added the Fiber frame fraction tweak and set it at 0.33. Other than that I set the ORBX effects to Day mode. System specs: Intel core i5 2500K 4.5ghz AMD Radeon 6870 1GB 8GB RAM 750 Watts PSU ASROCK P67 MOBO FSX is on a 1TB hard drive And numerous addons. Is there maybe something i missed or can do to improve my frames when flying in australia? Because in Europe I get great frames, i dont check the number but get between 25 (lowest) to 40 with the pmdg. Thanks!
-
Hi, I will soon be overclocking my i7 2600K to 4.5GHz and I was wondering what kind of performance I can expect on FSX with addons such as the PMDG NGX etc. Nvidia GTX 570 2x (4GB) G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3 RAM. i7 2600k @3.4GHz (Soon to be 4.5). Coolermaster Hyper 212 Evo ASUS P8Z68-V Pro. Kriss -
AVSIM is an enduring institution in the virtual aviation world providing a dependable and consistent platform to exchange knowledge and ideas. Over the years many of the leading flight simulation software and hardware gurus have graced these forums, gathering and honing their skills while dramatically increasing the quality of our hobby. Although a few names may stand out above others, the list of unique contributors is long and varied and we thank them one and all. Paul Johnson has put together the AVSIM Software and Hardware Guide for both the DX9 and DX10 versions of FSX. It incorporates the latest and best techniques and the tried and true standbys into detailed instructions on what to do and how to do it. Paul will periodically update the guide as needed on a regular basis as new information, equipment and methods evolve. We hope that you will benefit from the accumulated wealth of knowledge presented here. Here it is: http://forum.avsim.net/files/file/1-fsx-hardware-software-guide/ Note: Latest version of Adobe Reader REQUIRED This post has been promoted to an article -
Aime Leclerq is an extremely skilled FS-product maker. I am curious to know if the products that are made by "Oscar (Aime)" are hard on FPS, even if I try the lowest version offered. If anybody with any of those products can give me any info on whether it hurts FPS or if it's like default or not. ~Thanks!~ -
Hello, I have FS2Crew 2010 for MAddog for fs9 with SP3 installed and when I load the aircraft at any airport I have an average of 20 FPS in external view and 8 FPS in 2D cockpit view. Before installation I used to have an average of 80/ 30 FPS with MAddog and no FS2Crew. Is there any solution? Thanks in advance!! ps. Awesome addon
-
I am new to AVSIM, thought i would post to see if anyone is having the same performance issues as i am or possibly a solution to my (hair pulling :mad:) problem. My Frame rates are fluctuating from 7-30 FPS at any airport(addon scenery and default) any aircraft(addon aircraft or default) and do not go any higher than my record 31 fps :lol: . My average is about 21 FPS in the air and 11 FPS on the ground. I have FSX gold which comes with Acceleration so both service packs are installed. My setup goes as follows: HERES THE KICKER- I7 2700K CPU OVERCLOCKED TO 4.8GHZ(SCRATCHING MY HEAD) ASUS P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3 MOBO 1200W PSU 8GB VENGEANCE RAM @2133MHZ EVGA NVIDIA GTX 680 VIDEO CARD WITH 2GBS OF V MEMORY OCZ AGILITY 3 480GB SSD(ONLY FSX INSTALLED ON THIS) I am getting the same performance on fsx now as i did when my processor was not overclocked!!! In fact I recently restored default settings in my bios and for some wierd reason FSX loaded textures quicker without the overclock!! same frames though. what ive already tried: Ive already tried the ******* tweak! -after this i had crazy stutters, horrible FPS, and slow texture loading in the default 747! Ive already tried setting frames unlimited- no difference Ive already tried an External frame limiter- set at high 60 fps or above w/ the FSX limiter at 40 gives best results(31fps not locked goes down to 18 in some areas) also lots of shimmering and tearing when moving camera angles. Ive already tried changing things around in Nvidia Inspector- yeilds alright FPS but who wants to fly a plane that looks like FS 2000? Besides i have sufficient hardware that should handle it fine. The best results ive had and that is 30 FPS LOCKED with no stutters or shimmering was with Word Not Allowed's Hardware and Tuning guide. I would stick to these settings but with Antialiasing turned off i might as well have saved a few hundred bucks and not have built such an expensive machine, or spent all the money on addons to have the same look as freeware! I get frustrated when i hear that people are getting smooth 60fps and higher in their sims with alright hardware and im barely pulling 28 on a good day with high end components! there has to be something not right to have such a high overclock and no better performance. I even tried it at 5.0ghz and still no difference! Im sure there is a setting missing somewhere.
-
Hello (Apologies if this is the wrong area to post such a thing) I bought the Airbus X Extended yesterday, but only got round to trying it today. First impression is a promising aircraft that I would love to fly, with one major flaw. Unlike the NGX in which I get 22fps constantly (locked internally at 22) no matter where I am, the AXE likes to bring that down to 9 fps for some reason... The maximum fps I have been able to achieve with it so far is 12 fps............. I just wanted to ask if this is a known problem that other people have too, or if its just me, because right now, I'm back with the NGX untill some sort of HOTFIX has been created:/ sorry aerosoft.... Advice appreciated (PS I have this hotfix installed but still no joy...:( http://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/topic/60728-hotfix-1-released-am-211212/)
-
Hello I'm running FSX, thinking if it's possible to get those nice FPS with the PMDG 737 with complex scenery add-on? I think overclocking may help me here. My rig: CPU: Intel Core i7 2600k (New cooler needed, i know) MB: Gigabyte P67A UD4 B3 Ram: 8 Gb G.skill Trident DDR3 1600Mhz (8-8-8-24) GPU: XFX Radeon HD7770 1GB GDDR-5 Dual fan PSU: Corsair 450VX Psu Case: Cooler Master Silencio 650 My i7 is running up to 3.8 at stock speeds, but will overclocking close to 5 ghz improve my FPS much? Guldager -
Hello avsim! Yes I'm very new to all of this. But from the time I loaded FSX onto my computer, I was hooked! Now before you judge the title... yes I know there have been thousands of topics on this but, please listen to what I have to say. I purchased a MacBook Pro last fall, before school started, it's my baby! I purchased the 13-inch model for portability, and processor speed. Before I go any further here are the specs: 13-inch (Early 2011) MacBook Pro 2nd Generation Intel CORE i7 dual core (four virtual cores) processor 2.7GHz-3.4GHz max turbo dependant upon active cores (i7-2620M) Intel HD 3000 Graphics Processor (on CPU chip) 500GB HDD @5400 RPM (partitioned in half for Mac OS X, and windows) I have Windows 7 Home Premium 64-Bit installed in a 250GB BootCamp partition. Now to my question. I love using the PMDG 737 NGX, right now I have the high-res textures installed in the VC, and I'm getting 11-12 fps at Fly Tampa's Tampa Rebooted add-on scenery. Outside the VC in spot view I get 25-30fps. I have learned that I can install an external GPU via a Thunderbolt port (Lightpeak). If I were to install a Nvidia GTX 570, and overclock it, plus add 4GB-8GB more RAM, and possibly an SSD, would I see significant improvement in fps? I would not be running REX, or anything else, just the NGX, and add-on airports. I realize my current GPU is not the best, but my processor does fairly well, and with everything but the CPU replaceable, I'm stuck with it, and no way to overclock it. I would even be willing to opt for the 580, or 590 if it would guarantee me more fps. This is getting long... wow. I'm just looking to increase my fps to 20+ in the NGX's VC. The only thing I cannot change is my CPU, or its speed. Please help, all post are greatly appreciated, thank you! I also wish to use an external monitor. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated! -
Hello everyone, I'm enjoying seeing all the user PC specs and the FPS they are pulling down. And the screenshots all look amazing. But one thing I'm wondering is if these are with or without AI traffic. AI traffic is the only reason I'm playing FSX over XPlane-10. And I don't want to bother buying an expensive PC system if I'm still not going to get good traffic. So, what is you FPS (and your system specs) using AI traffic (such as UT2 at 70% or more)?
