All of them. After the first billion a % incremental forecast is attached for the following year. If the company comes out again with just another billion the forecast was not met and therefore it is considered a lost. Why? No growth. Funny isn't it. You probably saying: Come one, they made another BILLION for heaven sake. Nope. It's a lost.

 

Cheers,

 

As the Duke of Wellington once said "If you believe that, Sir, you'll believe anything."

 

How about answering the original question - Does that mean the needs of the many (simmers) should be met even if it's not profitable?

As the Duke of Wellington once said "If you believe that, Sir, you'll believe anything."

 

How about answering the original question - Does that mean the needs of the many (simmers) should be met even if it's not profitable?

 

It looks to me that someone believes that Wellington won when in reality Napoleon lost. But, "If you believe that, Sir, you'll believe anything."

 

Cheers,

 

MAB

 

How about answering the original question - Does that mean the needs of the many (simmers) should be met even if it's not profitable?

 

You better define what and when something is profitable. The last I checked in any transaction two sides must reach satisfaction in the exchange and not just the profiteer mind you.

You better define what and when something is profitable. The last I checked in any transaction two sides must reach satisfaction in the exchange and not just the profiteer mind you.

 

 

The last time I checked, profiteeer was defined as to "make or seek to make an excessive or unfair profit, especially illegally"

Some types of profiteering are illegal, such as price fixing syndicates and other anti-competitive behaviour, for example on fuel subsidies (see British Airways price-fixing allegations), or restricted by industry codes of conduct such as aggressive marketing of products in the third world such as baby milk (see Nestlé boycott).

 

But not always I guess...

 

Cheers,

All irrelevant to the question.