January 7, 201412 yr Any users? I had the Flight 1 ATR-72 500, my preferred turboprop commuter for FSX before the Majestic Q-400. Am seriously considering this one, but would like to read about your experiences :-) Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
January 7, 201412 yr Any links? I can't seem to find any information about this. PS. You need to change "do" to "to" in your signature. Christopher Low AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU / 64GB DDR5-6000 RAM / 12GB Nvidia RTX 4070 Super GPU / Gigabyte X870E Aorus Elite Wifi 7 / 1+2TB Samsung Evo Plus M2 Nvme UK2000 Beta Tester
January 7, 201412 yr Author Any links? I can't seem to find any information about this. PS. You need to change "do" to "to" in your signature. Oops! Typo :-/ Thx!!!! Link: http://www.mcphatstudios.net/x-plane-aerosoft-mcphat-atr-72-500 Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
January 7, 201412 yr If you are looking for a turbo-commuter I'd spend my money on the Saab 340 instead, I was very disappointed with the ATR and parked it for good after 1 flight. None of the two has any sophisticated NAV equipment, on the other hand, the s340 doesn't pretend to have one either as the early s340A's only had basic VOR/NDB equipment unlike the later models which had a FMC. The ATR uses the default GPS instead of a proper FMC and there's no other system simulation of any depth. You jump in and fly (as advertised) and that's about it. Personally, I am not too impressed with the VC either, to put it this way, the s340 has everything the ATR doesn't. Also a higher price but it's worth it (compared to the ATR).
January 7, 201412 yr True, that ATR won't be systems deep as the Saab (really great btw), but is a nice easy plane that I like to use for simpler, relaxing and fun flights, it is very easy on the fps. Hey no torque effect for you! Very easy on the handling, also very simple systems. I'm not an expert on ATR but this is a very slow climber. Great textures BTW! Alexander Colka
January 7, 201412 yr No custom plugin, simple default systems, but beautiful plane and very nice to fly. http://forum.avsim.net/topic/392958-landing-in-pointe-a-pitre-tffr/ I still hope the future will be more detailed: Georges - OpenStreetMap - Ubuntu GNU/Linux -
January 7, 201412 yr Author Thank you all guys... In my To-Buy list are now: - The Saab 340 ( has been there for quite a long while :-) - This ATR72 ;-) Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
Create an account or sign in to comment