Christopher Low

Donor
  • Content count

    8,745
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Christopher Low last won the day on February 12 2016

Christopher Low had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

730 Excellent

About Christopher Low

  • Rank
    Member - 3,000+
  • Birthday 07/31/1967

Flight Sim Profile

  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Contact Methods

  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Ulverston, England
  • Interests
    Comet Orbits

Recent Profile Visitors

5,946 profile views
  1. The easiest way to solve the OOM/VAS issue would be to purchase P3D v4.
  2. EDIT: Ah, I see that I have been misunderstood. Pete probably thought that I meant that Monarch flights were included in UT Live, but I was referring to the AI environment on my own PC! Nothing to do with UT Live.
  3. So, does this mean that all variables would be saved if I prepar3d my flight in advance in either FSX or P3D v2? As for my testing, I have managed to get it in the air without issues (with TOGA/flaps/landing gear/AP functions working), and also following the flightplan. Now I just need to get it to my destination, and test the ability of the plane to capture the VOR LOC/glideslope, and land without any issues. I have noticed that the ILS approach at my destination airport is not stated in the flightplan (even though I followed the instructions in the Quick Start manual). It ends with the NDB on the final approach path. Is that normal with this aircraft, or should the ILS entries be there? By this, I mean like the PMDG 737 NGX which has entries like FI27, CI27, and RW27 (and the associated speeds/altitudes).
  4. I always remember that there were fewer AI issues at startup when using UT2 over BGL driven traffic. By that, I mean those annoying habits of AI planes to land short of a runway/dive down from high altitude/approach way too high etc. How do the AI planes behave in UT Live on startup?
  5. No, Air Berlin has been removed. Not sure if I ever had Fly Niki (I only have flightplans installed that are relevant to my flights around the UK and Ireland, plus quick trips across the North Sea to Amsterdam Schiphol and Copenhagen Kastrup).
  6. Pet's gonna hate me for this, but......I still have Monarch flying on my PC
  7. I am testing to see if I can use the Quality Wings Avro RJ in P3D v3.3. I usually prefer to set up a flight and save it, so that I can pushback on startup at a later date. This works perfectly with the PMDG 737 NGX and 747-400, but unfortunately it seems that not all of the changes are saved with the Quality Wings Avro RJ. It looks like the flightplan/fuel loads etc that I added in the FMC are OK, but any changes to the MCP/TRP/AP/Flaps are not. Is this normal, or is there a way to get the QW software to save ALL changes of this kind?
  8. I switched the default aircraft in P3D v3.3 from the F22 Raptor to the standard Beechcraft B58 Baron. I seem to remember that the Raptor affected soemthing with one of my payware planes (probably the PMDG 737 NGX), so I decided to change to one of the classic models from yesteryear
  9. LOL @ $3000 Madness
  10. Are you saying that the provided AFD file includes AI parking spots that have static aircraft on top of them? Surely the developer should have avoided this??
  11. I run P3D v3.3.5 @ 1920x1080 with 8xS AA and 4x SGSS Supersampling.
  12. The ironic part of this story is that PMDG's refusal to consider a new version of the MD11 will probably make the plane some kind of "technological martyr", and then everyone will want one!!
  13. That's a good question, and it will require an answer from someone who has a bit more experience of those top end graphics cards than I do.
  14. BARGAIN

    It's also worth noting that you will not see an option for installation in P3D v4 if you do not have P3D v4 installed on your PC.
  15. The graphics card is the only component in that system that you should even be thinking about upgrading.