Jump to content

Christopher Low

Members
  • Content Count

    14,496
  • Donations

    $15.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

5,354 Excellent

2 Followers

About Christopher Low

  • Rank
    Member - 10,000+
  • Birthday 07/31/1967

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Ulverston, England
  • Interests
    Comet Orbits

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

18,238 profile views
  1. According to Gary Summons (UK2000 developer) they seem to have resolved the issue with the "purple and lime green textures" on the Isle of Man
  2. I can live with another delay if they fix the "land bars" issue, and the Isle of Man.
  3. The -300ER is not the version of the 777 that I would want, so I will have to wait even longer before I can consider a purchase.
  4. I have tried reinstalling LFBO, but I have not done the same for ENTO. I guess that is my next task.
  5. Good to know that MK Studios are developing LPPT v2. I will wait for that one to be released.
  6. If the MAX cockpit has significant differences to the NG, then I would expect PMDG to model this in their simulated version. Despite the comment above about PMDG being "the masters of recycling", they do not generally release products with "cut and paste" content from another product.
  7. There is a small lake called Lago das Encrobas located around 6 or 7 miles south of the runway 03 threshold at LECO A Coruna (just beyond a ridge). Unfortunately, this seems to have a mesh issue which is rendering cliffs on all sides (like an impact crater). I have checked this lake out on Google Maps, and the sides are nothing like the cliffs that can be seen in MSFS. Is there anything that can be done about this? I hate seeing it every time that I approach the airport from the south. https://www.google.com/maps/@43.197575,-8.4173368,3a,75y,42.43h,94.21t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sAF1QipOt-QMTDACzWe69hpOz4bwryrR85hLZYqb4X-H5!2e10!3e11!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipOt-QMTDACzWe69hpOz4bwryrR85hLZYqb4X-H5%3Dw900-h600-k-no-pi-4.206856941199874-ya42.434429417738976-ro0-fo90!7i4096!8i2048?coh=205410&entry=ttu Screenshot links attached. https://www.mediafire.com/view/gqhciy3xv5ivbtr/Screenshot_%28297%29.jpg/file https://www.mediafire.com/view/b7alnfujbm14j42/Screenshot_%28298%29.jpg/file https://www.mediafire.com/view/fqaf5ume2rzx3wj/Screenshot_%28299%29.jpg/file https://www.mediafire.com/view/01gnfdegvmg8cl8/Screenshot_%28300%29.jpg/file
  8. I had v3 Ultra installed, so I guess that this will probably be a BIG leap forward in content for me
  9. It looks like download speeds are good for this package at FlyAwaySimulation. I had assumed that it would be restricted to 2Mbps without a PRO membership, but I have just downloaded it at 65Mbps.
  10. I tried to load the Flightbeam LFBO Toulouse Blagnac scenery this morning, and it froze on the loading screen. This happens every now and again with various airports, and a reboot of MSFS always resolves the issue. Unfortunately, this solution did not work this time. I suspected that there must be a conflict between the Flightbeam scenery and one of the more recent airports that I have installed, so I did a bit of detective work.... .....and I have discovered that there is a conflict between Flightbeam LFBO and ORBx ENTO Torp Sandefjord on my PC. The ENTO scenery loads and works fine with LFBO installed, but the latter refuses to load at all. Can anyone else with both of these addons installed test this to see if it happens on your PC? If so, I will send a report to Flightbeam.
  11. Yes, and the quality and placement of these is orders of magnitude better than that seen in P3D or FSX. It really does look rather lovely when draped over those photorealistic landscapes, so PG is definitely not an essential item for me.
  12. Planet 9 has no relevance to Nibiru, or massive floods on Earth. This hypothetical object is so far out that it does not even disturb the orbit of Neptune....and that's the point. Those TNOs well beyond the outer edge of the Kuiper Belt are too far out to be controlled by Neptune's gravity, which is why certain similarities in their orbital characteristics indicate the presence of another massive object much further out.
×
×
  • Create New...