September 24, 201411 yr No Ai / ATC or lack of airpprts has not made me stop flying in xpx. Heck I enjoy it so much that I fly it even at 15 fps. Ryzen 5 1600x - 16GB DDR4 - RTX 3050 8GB - MSI Gaming Plus
September 24, 201411 yr Is it optimised to perform better then fsx ? LOL lets not talk about Fsx especially performance. Ryzen 5 1600x - 16GB DDR4 - RTX 3050 8GB - MSI Gaming Plus
September 24, 201411 yr Great shots...wow...but I have a request... for the next set of graphic quality such as these....could you please also have up, the FPS counter, so I can compare what you have...to your system-FPS generated, to my system. That would be most helpful. Thanks! On my system, LOWI and surroundings gives me about 24 FPS. I think XPX.30 can be a winner on most systems today....for mine is over 4 years old! http://fsfiles.org/flightsimshotsv2/QnX Mitch
September 24, 201411 yr Is it optimised to perform better then fsx ? It is optimised to run on hardware as good as can be had and take advantage of whatever you can give it, the code is tight. My setup is nothing to write home about but can maintain 26-30fps in all situations on high settings that look really well. That might not sound like a lot but the fluidity at that has to be seen to be believed. Anyone I know that flies XP for a while gave up on the others entirely, it's that good with a little effort to make it so as it doesn't look as good out of the box as it can be made to look. It's rock solid performance wise with none of the crashes or ooms that are part and parcel of the others. There simply is no like.
Create an account or sign in to comment