August 24, 20178 yr 1 hour ago, darem said: actually, it's quite obvious that this is a sim shot. Too much reflection, too shiny, too "toylike" for a real shot. Looks nice, but far from real - I call it the XP11 desease ;-). Sorry. I agree, it's a nice picture no doubt, but it doesn't convince me into thinking it's real world though and i don't know why that is. MSI MPG Z490 Gaming Plus | Intel Core i9-10900K @ 5.3GHz | 64GB Corsair Vengeance | Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3090 | 500 GB M.2 NVMe for win | 2TB M.2 NVMe for FS2024 | TrackIr v5 | Honeycomb Alpha & Bravo | Thrustmaster Hotas Warthog Eric from EHAM, a flying Dutchman.
August 24, 20178 yr 7 hours ago, Murmur said: The things you're talking about are mainly post-processing effects probably added by some external tool like reshade or a similar one, and can be tuned up or down. Maybe the following unedited screenshots will convince you that X-Plane can indeed do very realistic images. I don't see any imaginary "X-Plane disease": http://i.imgur.com/MHzcvvT.jpg http://i.imgur.com/8mcZJay.jpg (I'm adding the images as external links, hopefully that won't break the rules of only one image set per topic). The last one looks very realistic. I agree.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.