Jump to content

A few shots of -8


LRBS

Recommended Posts

Posted

Wonderful pictures/shots of the 747-8 Freighter! Really like this simple but elegant blue/white house livery. Wondering what those long hours would be for the pilots cooped up in that large plane with "just a few windows"!

What make engines does this one have/use? Must be rather powerful!

Posted
46 minutes ago, P_7878 said:

Wonderful pictures/shots of the 747-8 Freighter! Really like this simple but elegant blue/white house livery. Wondering what those long hours would be for the pilots cooped up in that large plane with "just a few windows"!

What make engines does this one have/use? Must be rather powerful!

It's not that bad on the upper deck. Roomy, but can get cramped with 8 people on a long flight.  Worse one I've done is 17 1/2 hrs of block with 8 people on the upper deck.

All B748 aircraft use the GE GenX engines.

Brian Thibodeaux | B747-400/8, C-130 Flight Engineer, CFI, Type Rated: BE190, DC-9 (MD-80), B747-400

beta.gif   

My Liveries

Posted

Thank's for the shots!

I like the trim setting why they didn't place in the 400, where the MD11 already had in the first place.

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, simbio said:

Thank's for the shots!

I like the trim setting why they didn't place in the 400, where the MD11 already had in the first place.

Well besides being a different manufacturer.  The B744 was developed two years prior to the MD-11.

And while it is nice to see it on the screen, the Trim indicator on the 400 is not in a bad location.  It's a bit combersome in the simualtor to use, but in the aircraft it's easy to see.  Just look at your leg, only time you really need to reference it is when you set it for departure or when verifying it.

Brian Thibodeaux | B747-400/8, C-130 Flight Engineer, CFI, Type Rated: BE190, DC-9 (MD-80), B747-400

beta.gif   

My Liveries

Posted

Great pics! Wonder one thing: if it uses 787 engines, why doesn't boeing make a trent 1000 version, as it would maybe make BA and other 744RR operators change their minds about the -8 and it could be more attractive for them. Also I felt that @ TOGA the trent 1000 was much more powerful.

Posted
22 hours ago, LH340fan said:

Great pics! Wonder one thing: if it uses 787 engines, why doesn't boeing make a trent 1000 version, as it would maybe make BA and other 744RR operators change their minds about the -8 and it could be more attractive for them. Also I felt that @ TOGA the trent 1000 was much more powerful.

Both the 78 and the 748 utilize the GEnx engines. Granted different variants/thrust ratings.  You'll have to ask Boeing why they decided not to go with any RR engines. Could be any number of reasons.  The Trent has a 1" larger diameter.  Which might translate to more than an inch in the cowling.  That might not seem like much but the 748 is already close enough for pod strikes landing in crosswinds require a different technique in crosswinds than the 744.

Brian Thibodeaux | B747-400/8, C-130 Flight Engineer, CFI, Type Rated: BE190, DC-9 (MD-80), B747-400

beta.gif   

My Liveries

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...