simbio

I believe the market is there, but you have also to listen what costumer want before starting this journey. Post some Idea on mycockpit dot org and see what suggestion people will rise. Selling only the panel, I don't think will be enough, you should give more argument.

So you pay 99$ and then another XX to upgrade for P3D, but then if the price to move is 50$ it's 150$. Maybe it's better to understand the full price of P3D.

Unfortunately PFPX in Europe don't do a good job, for the mentioned restriction RAD. The majority of the time when you validate the route within PFPX it doesn't pass eurocontrol restriction. For Europe I will use https://www.eurofpl.eu/ just create an account set an airframe information, then fill your DEP and ARR it's free. For USA nothing can be wrong apart that you read Notam for airspace and airport. Create proper flight plan it's a big task that need a lot's of knowledge if you want to simulate as real as it get.

So you know what he want to archive?

Do this, download the paintkit from PMDG, then with operation center install the sas livery import it on the paintkit so you can use as base for your creation.

You are the perfect spotter ! ! You should upload to Airliners :wink:

Really interesting and it's really easy to set apart from sync Airtrack .

You could do some comics about Norwegian pilots tales the screenshots looks so dramatic and illustrative.

I had two SSD with w7 installed and then proceed to upgrade win 10 after reboot on win 10 Faststart change permision on W7 ssd and compromise the MBR so I lost w7. My advice is to unplug hd with winxp then install win10 in separate ssd or hd and then disable faststart; but be carefull on updating win 10 it can change option setting. If you’re dual booting, it’s best not to use Fast Startup or Hibernation at all.

Yep but put over the MCP and you have no more visual on the monitor. LoL In any case the radio is really a big improvement if you fly online.

No unfortunately there is no g-clamp or any sort, I attached mine to the throttle support

Yep it work fine with Saitek driver or with Spad driver.

Hi, I posted in Xpilot forum but not getting any info. I am new to xsaitekpanels and also to Xplane plugin. I download the xsaitekpanels , dataref and Python plugin but lost on how to program the xsaitekpanels.ini. I have the radio and the Multipanel I end up, to download the file from someone contribution, but the knob of altitude is stuck and I cannot turn it in the VC and neither in the Saitek MCP. Also the HDG CRS VS I can turn in the VC but not in the Multipanel. the trim wheel is not working For the radio the only one that it's not working properly is the QNH not synch by 1 units ixeg 733 xsaitekpanels.ini Can someone point me on how to program or tell me how to solve this glitch Thank you

Some big problem here **We Are Under Attack**. Please visit us at: http://www.sim-outhouse.net/forum/forum.php

Is it the project with the title "Attention all DC-3 fans" on SOH forum that integrate the new VC?

Tres fable cest la meme boite

This is, one of the great mistake on using BUMP/NORMAL on material, you can't simulate 3D with just 4096*4096. It's better to work with pixel in the diffuse map (basemap) like little dark line or rivet to simulate shadow. This effect is an old technique used on render but was really awful with low size texture. Anyway thank's for the link.

But, is there a Juancho E Yraunsquin in Norway ? because this name is the Dutch airport in Caribbean island of Saba not in Europe. With tubeliners or prop ? For Prop Courchevel LIRJ RWY 16 Tube Not that difficult but LFMN circle to land 4L4R Lugano a steep approach LICR Visual RWY 33

http://www.eadt.eu/index.php?new-x737-version-5 http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?/files/file/21649-douglas-dc-9-30-unfinished/ http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?/files/file/22160-let-l-410-for-x-plane-1045/

Maybe Ezca will help you but it's a payware the other mention are free.

Does flight1 GTN work with this version?

It's outstanding, super, great emotion this are professional realization. Bravo

nice screenshot thumbs up.

Maybe i am wrong but they already metion that they will drop the code for fs2k ground poly since 3.0. Unfortunately this method could suck up to 10 fps instead of adapting the new zbias. For developer view it's a problem because they need to adapt the ground in 3d to follow the terrain. The old solution there was no need as it would bend with the code. Believe or not the need to drop the old code is necessary to gain fps and vas. The old scasm is the past and all developer need to update for the future that will add new material as fsx and use 4k texture.

Thank's I hope someone will jump and start write info and article.