LH340fan

Members
  • Content Count

    132
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

21 Neutral

About LH340fan

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

About Me

  • About Me
    My system specs: Core 2 quad Q9650 @ 3.51ghz, GTX1060 6gb, 8gb ddr3 1333, 1Tb seagate barracuda, 500gb wd blue

Recent Profile Visitors

250 profile views
  1. LH340fan

    New Custom CS 757 Sounds

    Are those RR only or both for PW and RR? (I only have BP)
  2. LH340fan

    What will be the next project by PMDG?

    I just got another idea. What if PMDG did a poll about which a/C to make (on avsim for ex)? They could get to know our wishes... far better than a google form imo
  3. LH340fan

    Leonardo Software MD-90(potentially) Question

    It's all to the LH team to decide, cuz i don't buy the fact they would stop the line here. They have to prepare something. As Md-90 seems the easiest in terms of modelling it's true that it requires data tho. But I frankly don't think this would be an issue for them. after all, they did the rare -88 version,and I don't think it even features same thrust ratings as the -83 for example. However, as the team is to my knowledge based in Italy, it could be an issue, as there are 0 md-90s in europe whatsoever. On the other hand, the md-11 would be promising both in terms of success and commercially. In fact, I don't know any of the larger airports that don't see an ups or even fedex md-11 every couple of nights in europe. That being said, it can't be done on a day. As the MD-11 features two engine types (CF6-80 and PW4400) and could be found as pax, cargo or even freighter, that makes at least 4 versions, demanding different data in accordance. But it has tons of cool quarks; such as teh deflected ailerons or even the smaller stab and the legendary avionics. IMO it'll be a go-go for me if they ever do any of them. They just need some time and motivation. THEIR TEAM ROCKS. and the stuff they do is well worth the money IMO. In fact, I don't know about you but personnally I find their fares cheaper to PMDGs. (But hey,don't wanna start an argument again....)
  4. LH340fan

    Leonardo Software MD-90(potentially) Question

    What will they do then? AN MD-11??... THAT would be AWESOME!! They can't just simply stop the great phylosopy there... They must hide something under their sleeves...
  5. LH340fan

    PBR VC MadDogX First Look

    how are the fps boss?
  6. LH340fan

    Which gate is which?

    Depends on the profile: it knows exactly your wingspan and GW. the gates that appear in green are the ones in which you fit, unlike the ones in grey. BTW I usually look for remote stands for cargo, and then check on the p3D menu. Otherwise I have a look on google maps and maybe offline charts, even older pdf ones. Guess it's still better than nothing
  7. LH340fan

    FSXWX

    Weird. Mine works most of the time but since I updated to 4.4 I get more and more CTDs
  8. LH340fan

    European airports

    since nobody said it, i'd say EBBR. looks gorgeous and so far has tons of potential
  9. LH340fan

    Which gate is which?

    as payware there's aivlasoft EFB 2, seems to work nice. You then can get charts from navigraph as well if you want.
  10. I agree that we are missing something like an md-11 or tu204. But don't forget that there are terrific add-ons that are well worth mentioning (maddogx) and that it takes time,money and effort to do "study level" stuff
  11. LH340fan

    CaptainSim 757 P3D v4

    Weird. I get all of them. maybe there is an option in the fms?
  12. LH340fan

    P3D V4 and the Boeing 767

    I don't defend the CS757 interests, I just give you my thoughts about my own xprience with it.
  13. LH340fan

    CaptainSim 757 P3D v4

    In my case i felt that it doesn't climb so much on takeoff and I have to pull a lot on the stick but rotation is fine for me
  14. LH340fan

    P3D V4 and the Boeing 767

    I don't really agree with you. When i first tested it it felt floaty, unrealistic and low on fps. However, I bought it during the winter sale. Sure. It's not PMDG level. Though it's not as bad as you might think. They fixed the geometry of the VC. the yoke doesn't look too low anymore. And the fms is more than decent, with even two flps for etops routing (neat). There are some issues, like no stepping unlike let's say the 787. Also he winds can't be requested. And the biggest issue is by far the msrp. Too high. I got it for 25 bucks, which is more than acceptable. And the fact there is no RR variant is dissapointing, although for 55 usd the whole thing it's ok. Another defect is vnav, quite buggy. I prefer doing it myself. No problem here. I think that most of the bugs were fixed on sp1 (v1.2) . If you didn't try latest build, you can't really see how good/ bad it is. I stay neutral, just giving you my houghs about it. IF ONLY they fix all the remaining bugs they may be like QW. I do enjoy it for sure. It can indeed fly. And it overally nice.
  15. LH340fan

    CaptainSim 757 P3D v4

    There's a little box next to the upper eicas that has different buttons (TO/GA, D-TO1,D-TO2 Temp/flex and CLB) You can click on those and the info about sel thrust will be shown on engine display, just a bit like in the md-80