The VNAV and SPD intervention bugs are annoying though. I would like to be able to fly this aircraft like the PMDG Boeings, but full control of these two features is essential for me to be able to do that. To be honest, I am finding it very difficult these days to accept a level of detail and depth less than that of the PMDG planes, which is why the FS Labs A320-X is now my primary target.

I've been enjoying this aircraft.  As far as I know, there hasn't been a single payware airplane that hasn't had some bugs when first released, including the very expensive ones.  Not all vendors have the same set of programmers, data, time to dedicate to their products, etc.  I'm grateful that we have some developers still working to make this hobby enjoyable and hope to see even more.  Hope pc flight simulation doesn't turn into a religion.  There's no need for dogma, canon, etc.  I enjoy the freedom to purchase what serves my purposes knowing that they don't have to be the same for everyone.  

I do find the banter back and forth funny.   If it's not in the manual it's not a fault... Obviously they have never built a real plane or had to flight test one.   There are many things we find as faults not in a manual and many things in the manual that are faults.  I had 5 pages in the manuals of nuisance faults on an aircraft when I was a field service engineer.    And since CS just released 1.4.0.4 with a whole list of problems resolved means they are working the problems, but like all vendors it does take time to resolve things.  Simulating an aircraft and systems is not as easy as actually flying the plane. 

 

Two cents

Don