September 24, 20205 yr 47 minutes ago, Ray Proudfoot said: Stan, Can you give me the exact model of your monitor and I’ll check if it supports 30Hz. If you set it in Nvidia Control Panel it should stick. I’ve never had mine revert to 60Hz. Yes, the mouse is jerky but I’ve learned to accept that because the benefits of staying with 30Hz are so good. What CPU and GPU do you have? Here's my system: Jetline Systems Gravity GT2 Operating System: Windows 10 Home Edition (64-Bit) Chassis: NZXT S340 Elite Mid-Tower, Black Motherboard: Gigabyte Aorus Z370 Gaming 5, LGA 1151 Processor: Intel 8th Gen Core i7 8700K (4.8GHz Overclock) Core Six Core CPU Cooling: Corsair Hydro Series H100i v2 Liquid Cooling System Memory: 32GB Corsair DDR4 SDRAM 3000MHz Graphics Processor: 11GB Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, PCI Express 3.0 System Power: 850 Watt Corsair RM Series Power Supply Sound Card: 7.1 High Definition Integrated Audio Primary Drive: 1TB Samsung EVO 860 Solid State Drive (SSD) NVMe SSD: 1TB Samsung EVO PLUS 970 Solid State Drive (SSD) NvMe SSD: 1TB Sabrent Solid State Drive (SSD) Secondary Drive: 2TB Mechanical Drive Optical Drive: 20x DVD/CD Burner Drive (USB) My monitor is the LG 27UL600 (4K, IPS) Stan
September 24, 20205 yr Moderator Stan, your CPU and GPU are almost the same as mine. But the monitor doesn’t support 30Hz at 3840*2160. Probably why it reverts to 60Hz. Ray (Cheshire, England). System: P3D v5.3HF2, Intel i9-13900K, MSI 4090 GAMING X TRIO 24G, Crucial T700 4Tb M.2 SSD, Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Hero, 32Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000Mhz RAM, Win 11 Pro 64-bit, BenQ PD3200U 32” UHD monitor, Fulcrum One yoke, Fulcrum Throttle Quadrant. Cheadle Hulme Weather website.
September 24, 20205 yr 2 hours ago, Ray Proudfoot said: Stan, your CPU and GPU are almost the same as mine. But the monitor doesn’t support 30Hz at 3840*2160. Probably why it reverts to 60Hz. Ah...Thought so. Thanks, Ray. I should be satisfied with 4.5 of P3d. It works beautifully. Someday I'll figure out why V5 isn't so reliable for me. Maybe when 5.1 comes out, all will be well. Stan
September 24, 20205 yr Moderator Stan, I’m very happy with v4.5 too and waiting for 5.1 before I even consider it. But as the PMDG737 is fine in v4 but may not be in v5 it’s not a given. Ray (Cheshire, England). System: P3D v5.3HF2, Intel i9-13900K, MSI 4090 GAMING X TRIO 24G, Crucial T700 4Tb M.2 SSD, Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Hero, 32Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000Mhz RAM, Win 11 Pro 64-bit, BenQ PD3200U 32” UHD monitor, Fulcrum One yoke, Fulcrum Throttle Quadrant. Cheadle Hulme Weather website.
September 30, 20205 yr Author one of the posters on another board was kind enough to send me a video of several games running in 1080, 2560x1444, and 3840x2160 simultaneously. So....since the 3000 series of cards aren't yet out, and my old 1070 runs my 1080 quite well, I thought I might go ahead and spring for a new monitor. But here's my question. If I buy a 4K monitor, will it run as well in 2K mode as a 2k only monitor ? If the answer is no, then at this point, it would seem best to hold at a 2K only monitor. Opinions ??
September 30, 20205 yr I think the common wisdom is that if you run a monitor at anything other than the advertised resolution, you will not be particularly satisfied. Gigabyte x670 Aorus Elite AX MB; AMD 7800X3D CPU; Deepcool LT520 AIO Cooler; 64 Gb G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO DDR5 6000; Win11 Pro; P3D V5.4; 1 Samsung 990 2Tb NVMe SSD: 1 Crucial 4Tb MX500 SATA SSD; 1 Samsung 860 1Tb SSD; Gigabyte Aorus Extreme 1080ti 11Gb VRAM; Toshiba 43" LED TV @ 4k; Honeycomb Bravo.
September 30, 20205 yr Moderator @anitelite, I have a UHD monitor and a pretty good one to boot. Unfortunately FS Labs Concorde has to run in 32-bit P3D v3.4 and the 4Gb limit on VAS means I have to set screen resolution to 1920*1080 to avoid running out of memory. Now given that is exactly one quarter of UHD you’d think the clarity would hardly be comprised but sadly it is. In terms of performance, i.e. fps, it will be fine but not for image quality. Moral of the story? Never ever run a monitor at anything other than its native resolution. Upgrade your graphics card first and then get the UHD monitor. Ray (Cheshire, England). System: P3D v5.3HF2, Intel i9-13900K, MSI 4090 GAMING X TRIO 24G, Crucial T700 4Tb M.2 SSD, Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Hero, 32Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000Mhz RAM, Win 11 Pro 64-bit, BenQ PD3200U 32” UHD monitor, Fulcrum One yoke, Fulcrum Throttle Quadrant. Cheadle Hulme Weather website.
September 30, 20205 yr Author Well said, Ray. Many thanks to all for the input. Looks like I'll sit on my hands a while longer.
October 1, 20205 yr 12 hours ago, Ray Proudfoot said: Now given that is exactly one quarter of UHD you’d think the clarity would hardly be comprised but sadly it is. In terms of performance, i.e. fps, it will be fine but not for image quality. I agree. More importantly, though, because 2k doesn’t divide cleanly into 4k like full HD does (from a resolution perspective), a 2k image would look even more fuzzy on a 4k screen. You’re not using a uniform square of pixels (2 x 2 or 4 x 4, for example) on screen to represent a single pixel in the image. i7-14700k | Asus ROG STRIX Z790-F Gaming WIFI | 32GB DDR5 RAM | MSI RTX 4080 Super | WD Black SN850X 1TB & 2TB | Corsair HX1000i ATX3.0 | MSI MAG401QR 40" monitor | Win 11 Pro 64-bit | Meta Quest 3
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.