December 20, 20205 yr Hello all, I was curious about which of these aircraft is the more complete from a simulation point of view. I know they're both considered good, but is one considered the superior similation to the other?
December 20, 20205 yr I'd say both are on pair. Two different aircraft and systems. Both teams aim for an almost complete remake of the aircraft from the flight dynamics to the systems. They both started with the FMC component and also some aspects of flight control in the NEO and turbine modelling in the CJ4. Both are adding AMAZING features and detail to the original models that came with MFS, and rising their free! offer to the level of the highest grade commercial offers for other platforms ( P3D / XP ), also creating a really new and welcomed reference for quality we should expect from any payware IMO. I am looking forward into the AEROSOFT CRJ. I had an excellent experience flying in the CRJ between Lisbon and Tenerife befre the CPOVID, last year. It's a great commuter !!! Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
December 20, 20205 yr They’re both incredible and getting better all the time. Both are well worth some time. Dave Current System (Running at 4k): ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-F, Ryzen 7800X3D, RTX 5090, 55" Samsung Q80T, 64GB DDR5 6000 RAM, EVGA CLC 280mm AIO Cooler, Brunner CLS-E NG Yoke, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS & Stick, Thrustmaster TCA Quadrant & Add-on, VirtualFly Ruddo+, TQ6+ and Yoko+, GoFlight MCP-PRO and EFIS, Skalarki FCU and MCDU
December 20, 20205 yr With respect to both development teams who are giving us all this for free...the WT CJ4 is now a few miles ahead of the A32X . WT have a done a lot of "core" development lately which means to date they are the only addon that provides complete VNAV/LNAV functionality like we would expect from a complex jet which they have done by implementing their own flight plan manager. FBW group are doing the same but they are not there yet.
December 20, 20205 yr 9 minutes ago, highflyer2020 said: With respect to both development teams who are giving us all this for free...the WT CJ4 is now a few miles ahead of the A32X . WT have a done a lot of "core" development lately which means to date they are the only addon that provides complete VNAV/LNAV functionality like we would expect from a complex jet which they have done by implementing their own flight plan manager. FBW group are doing the same but they are not there yet. To be fair, the A320 is a significantly more complex airplane than the CJ4, which includes dealing with a fly-by-wire and autothrottle system. They are both outstanding mods in their own right, but I wouldn’t say one is above the other just because one has VNAV currently. The FBW changelog for version 0.5 alone is 165 lines long! Edited December 20, 20205 yr by Gilandred Gary i9-13900K, Asus RTX 4080, Asus Z790 Plus Wi-Fi, 32 GB Ram, Seasonic GX-1000W, LG C1 48” OLED 4K monitor, Quest 3 VR
December 20, 20205 yr 7 minutes ago, Gilandred said: To be fair, the A320 is a significantly more complex airplane than the CJ4, which includes dealing with a fly-by-wire and autothrottle system. They are both outstanding mods in their own right, but I wouldn’t say one is above the other just because one has VNAV currently. The FBW changelog for version 0.5 alone is 165 lines long! The question was which one is more complete from a simulation point of view...and at the moment the CJ4 is closest. That isn't to say the FBW won't get there it's just a answer to the current state of affairs.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.