2 hours ago, Andreas Stangenes said:

Thanks for the info. Which of those version is the "correct" on? I downloaded the master branch from github. 

You need the WTFPMMEPOC branch which should be the one I linked. Master and flightsim.to are NOT updated for SU4 yet.

13 hours ago, Tuskin38 said:

It's the plane's fault, not the pilot. 

Also good job insulting the creator of the thread.

Just like it is Asobo's fault when someone has a bad mod and crashes the sim. SMH its never the end user fault. Make snark vidieo's get snark replys you think default planes in other sims are any better as far as physics? What other sim even have a default 787 buts lets all insult the developer (Asobo) some more and everything is all good.

Edited May 29, 20215 yr by jbdbow1970

As Jorg mentioned in the Q&A, we have a strike team looking at the premium planes (and indeed all the planes) to start scoping out how best to improve them.

As you can imagine, getting something like the 787 up to, say, where our CJ4 is (i.e. most avionics, nav, and systems are in good shape) is itself easily a project for a team of 5-10 for 6 months to a year or more. So the question is always resources and how far to go with each plane.

But, we definitely don't want to leave those planes behind, so expect to hear more about all that in the future.

-Matt

5 minutes ago, MattNischan said:

As Jorg mentioned in the Q&A, we have a strike team looking at the premium planes (and indeed all the planes) to start scoping out how best to improve them.

As you can imagine, getting something like the 787 up to, say, where our CJ4 is (i.e. most avionics, nav, and systems are in good shape) is itself easily a project for a team of 5-10 for 6 months to a year or more. So the question is always resources and how far to go with each plane.

But, we definitely don't want to leave those planes behind, so expect to hear more about all that in the future.

-Matt

Good to know, personally i have not used either the 747 or 787 despite buying the Premium Deluxe version at launch. Sadly despite looking great they both suffer serious issues that does not relate to a realistic simulation. Hoping they are improved given time.

1 hour ago, MattNischan said:

As Jorg mentioned in the Q&A, we have a strike team looking at the premium planes (and indeed all the planes) to start scoping out how best to improve them.

As you can imagine, getting something like the 787 up to, say, where our CJ4 is (i.e. most avionics, nav, and systems are in good shape) is itself easily a project for a team of 5-10 for 6 months to a year or more. So the question is always resources and how far to go with each plane.

But, we definitely don't want to leave those planes behind, so expect to hear more about all that in the future.

-Matt

 

1 hour ago, Car147 said:

Good to know, personally i have not used either the 747 or 787 despite buying the Premium Deluxe version at launch. Sadly despite looking great they both suffer serious issues that does not relate to a realistic simulation. Hoping they are improved given time.

Asobo stated many times they not doeing "study level" planes and i think this is OK i would say.

This is left for developer companies and that is a good policy - at least for me.

With the mods we have for the 747-8 and the 787-10 we have mutch better working planes just useable and very good flyable so..

 

cheers 😉

looks a bit like a badly setup COG...   Flying the 787 default today and seeing none of this.

Graham