October 30, 20223 yr 1 hour ago, tweekz said: I'd be interested if they think this behavior is indeed overexaggerated in MSFS (and they should tune it down), or they are just happy to have found a solution to cope with a dynamic environment now. I second that question. Also, what constitutes "aggressive dynamics of the MSFS atmosphere"? Seems like he's using a lot of words to say that turbulence is too bouncy everywhere and in all directions? The reviews I've seen seemed to indicate that the thrust-pitch coupling in non-turbulent air is actually reasonable. Improvements to the yaw logic might improve the roll-yaw coupling as well. 1 hour ago, jcomm said: evanescent Effervescent? Friendly reminder: WHITELIST AVSIM IN YOUR AD-BLOCKER. Especially if you're on a modern CPU that can run a flight simulator well. These web servers aren't free...
October 30, 20223 yr Hmmmm... I like progress on 737... but nobody (me) is waiting for this triple seven thingy. All (me) are waiting for the mighty 744. Real planes have four engines! 😄 (don't get this wrong you lucky triple seven people... me just jealous 😉 ) Cheers T.
October 30, 20223 yr He used the dash-hyphen 27 times. Is it done yet? When will it be released? Will it be freeware or payware? How much will it cost? Any updates on the progress? Will it work for Xbox? Can I be a beta tester? How's the performance in VR?
October 30, 20223 yr 2 hours ago, blingthinger said: I second that question. Also, what constitutes "aggressive dynamics of the MSFS atmosphere"? Seems like he's using a lot of words to say that turbulence is too bouncy everywhere and in all directions? The reviews I've seen seemed to indicate that the thrust-pitch coupling in non-turbulent air is actually reasonable. Improvements to the yaw logic might improve the roll-yaw coupling as well. Effervescent? Turbulence seems fine in the Fenix, maybe a problem with the PMDG aircraft.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.