Jump to content

Torsen

Members
  • Content Count

    515
  • Donations

    $10.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

489 Excellent

About Torsen

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    a few miles north of EDLN

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    Yes

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. perhaps the LNAV update to support proper curved legs like most other devs doing for ages? Oh wait... that was announced in 2019 already... word not allowed... at the moment honestly I do not wait for any news from them at all. They are by far not an innovative dev anymore. Solid but nothing special. In contrast to many other products out there I miss a lot of immersion. But happy to be proven wrong... who knows... Cheers T.
  2. Hi Matt, download link was provided already by Dan. If you still need more info on the FSR500 feel free to join Raul/FSReborns Discord. There is plenty of information available and we have several real 500 pilots answering questions. The center console FMS was introduced by WT with SU14. The FSR500 is coming with a lot of changes and additions to the G1000 so it was released with a "locked" version of SU13 functionality as every SU and especially the Betas are breaking a lot of things otherwise. Raul is currently working on lot of additions to the FSR500 including the center console. A complete list of the things already added/fixed or worked on was posted just a few weeks back: Hi Dan, I reposted the latest dev update from 15.2. above. I hope you are not refering to this as "long time I have seen any updates" 😉 The topic with the backup instrument was discussed a hundred times me think. Though you are right it is in a real world aircraft essential, you have three Garmin Screens with full redundancy on two busses fully simulated. It is highly unrealistic that all these will fail and in case of a complete loss of electrics/battery your backup instrument won't help you either. But yes, it is still on the list to be implemented. Though to be honest it has a low prio as Raul is more keen to bring additional features into the plane. Cheers T.
  3. If you are a MAC guy why not go Zibo and Xplane? Otherwise like mentioned above if you go p3d then I would stay in 4 or 5. Even if they are core development wise dead, they are at least officially supported. And have fun with your project.
  4. Raul at FSReborn is starting to check the G3X update for the Sting. But we will wait for the SU to be released officially and WTs work finished on the units. In addition PMS and TDS need to provide integration as the G3X by default is vfr only without external driver like GNS or GTN. In addition the TL-3000 Sirius made it back in the dev shortlist as it was waiting for the WT G3X update. So interesting G3X times ahead Cheers T.
  5. The Phenom will be a 300E and come with full blown G3000. Cheers T.
  6. One calls it bloatware and fanpackage. I would call it best choice of the three offerings and coming with additional features and optional extras. The //42 was at least really tested and flown in sim by Trent and is according to his feedback close to the real thing as far as the sim allows. Regarding sound it is a Rotax and they do not sound that great in real life also 😉 If you have a bush scenery supporting it with stones and stuff the soft tundra tires will eat them and ground behaviour is really nice.
  7. The Carenado Navajo with Rep package is working nice and smooth in XP12. Cheers T.
  8. Thanks for putting exactly my thoughts together 😄 We could discuss the order but as its changing on daily base atm I fully agree... Cheers T.
  9. I can confirm its working fine ootb in the flow. You will see a short popup with the settings change dialog that disappears directly again as it has to work around the non working keybind but otherwise fine. Cheers T.
  10. me think the biggest problem hasn't been discussed yet. I can't fly a plane that every few weeks throws PMS on me... hell you don't know where you end up, if you are lucky you get only snippy comments from your GTN... 😁😬 #runforcover have nice flights with whatever GTN 😉 Cheers T.
  11. Yes TDS using latest garmin trainer. In addition TDS is the newer GTNxi where PMS is somewhat close to the older GTN. It's quite a religious question which one to choose. Want it as close to real as possible then its the TDS and you have to live with the more limited and older garmin database. Are you ok with a close to real rendition and prefer a better sim integration using the sim database (or navigraph updated) then you go PMS. PMS you have to stay always updated on latest version as its known to have impact on other addons even not using PMS and notoriously breaking things. TDS is more relaxed in this terms. Ah and the pricing model on the PMS is quite weird for what you get in comparison to TDS. In the end both are valid solutions... Cheers T.
  12. Hmmm. weird indeed. I just checked again and read about it and if you have the GNS WT package with the actual image of the gauge installed in parallel it should work as a linker package and do this job. Working on my end on all affected planes without a problem. Cheers T.
  13. The plane is going down quite a bit if you load her up and the nose is getting high a lot. Pax are not modelled. Cargo is modelled (even though I ask myself who is waiting for xbox x packages to be delivered in the rural bush strips...). Actually there are a lot of discussions about the zombie pax in different models. I'm always splitted on these, too. Cheers T.
  14. Interesting. Mine is showing the correct WT GNS and not modded anything on the plane itself. Is it possible that if you still have the additional WT GNS package installed it will redirect all default to the correct latest WT one? Cheers T.
  15. Thats one of the nice things of our hobby. You can do a lot of stuff and whatever you like. But actually that is something I never understood. I have absolutely no interest in what real world operators do and which routes they fly. In addition most of the modern planes are sooooo boring to fly. I love my Fenix and my pmdg 737 and fly them a lot. But honestly if I fly a BAe146, F28 or a DC6 I actually have way more fun and its much more immersive and satisfying to fly a pilots plane correctly and not just manage a modern one. But again that is what makes our hobby so great. We all find our niche... Cheers and have fun T.
×
×
  • Create New...