February 17Feb 17 10 hours ago, Zatoichi said: Sorry, but in my opinion the people I see using MSFS tend to tout it's pretty face, not it's fidelity. Even in this thread the scenery is being presented as a strong point. That might be because it looks gorgeous 😉 Regarding fidelity MSFS 2024 is a very mature simulator, with its native flight planner and the advanced avionics, just to name a few. Aircraft addons, especially from the likes of A2A and Blacksquare, are very good and they are certainly not inferior to P3D aircraft. To each their own of course, but there is no way I would return to P3D because it has more fidelity, that's definitely not my experience. But in case of a return, I would always go back to v5.4, which is the version that suits me the most. There are just not enough addons available for v6... I still have faint hope LM will surprise us all with a staggeringly great v7. There is no way one can have to many flight sims 😁 Edited February 17Feb 17 by Rimshot Cheers, Bert AMD Ryzen 5900X, 32 GB RAM, RTX 3080 Ti, Windows 11 Home 64 bit, MSFS 2024
February 17Feb 17 23 hours ago, dave2013 said: BTW, your screenshot doesn't look much different than one I could take using P3D. Dave Sure, go take a screenshot on approach into Narita using default weather, scenery, lighting and post it. I’m sure it’ll look nothing like this.
Create an account or sign in to comment