-
VOR signal check request please (pic)
In the real world this navaid is an NDB/DME. The NDB is tunable on 223 and the DME is located on 114.4. If you mouse over the VOR symbol in the FSX in-game map, the tag says "high altitude DME." Hope this helps. Todd
-
Airport Runway misaligned with ILS approach for default KSEA
You are correct and I was wrong. My apologies for misreading the OP's post. I was going to suggest a scenery conflict, but the OP seems to have solved the problem. Todd
-
Airport Runway misaligned with ILS approach for default KSEA
The current Runway 16L/34R at KSEA was not placed in service until after FSX was released. The current 16C/34C is shown as 16L/34R in FSX. My guess is that this is the root of the OP's problem. Magnetic variation should not have an effect on ILS capture in vanilla FSX, because the ILS data is coded as true heading and not magnetic heading. If the localizer is situated on the runway centerline, and on the same true heading as the runway, then the airplane should be able to follow the localizer path and stay aligned with the runway centerline, no matter what magnetic variation model is being used. Todd
-
Customizing Lat/Long Display
Hi,The default display in FSX for Latitude and Longitude coordinates is in degrees and minutes. Does anyone remember how to change the units to degrees-minutes-seconds?There is an edit to fsx.cfg that will do this, but I have forgotten what it was.Any response will be appreciated.Thanks,Todd
-
HST VOR not displaying on VOR Indicator
Graham,It appears that HST is a TACAN and not a VOR. The TACAN is a military version of the VOR, operating in the UHF range as opposed to VHF.This particular TACAN is situated at Homestead ARB. All TACANs in the FS world have DME capabilities only.In the map view a TACAN is represented by a square, instead of the hexagon within a square which is used for a VOR/DME.Hope this helps,Todd
-
Why do so many default scenery bgls have 'errors'?
Martin,These problems occur because the decompiling tools have bugs and shortcomings.NewBGLAnalyze, for example, can not properly decompile some elements in ATIS/AWOS/ASOS radio frequencies. Attempts to recompile the files will result in error messages. There are similar faults in handling of certain instrument approach legs, taxiway signs, and VASI/PAPI arrangements.You will probably find it easier to do much of what you want with a program like ADE9X. Editing a BGL file directly is a high-risk endeavor, as you have discovered.Todd
-
I am trying to add named waypoints to FSX
Lynn,It appears that your coordinates are reversed and your waypoint has materialized near the South Pole. :( Try this:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><FSDataversion="9.0"xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="bglcomp.xsd"><Waypointlat="N40 45 43.80"lon="W085 47 01.20"waypointType="NAMED"magvar="5"waypointRegion="K5"waypointIdent="FRIDG"></Waypoint></FSData>Let me know if this works!Todd
-
FS9 Display True Heading
Jim,The magnetic bearings you are receiving from SHIFT-Z are based on a circa 2005 magnetic north model. Many VOR installations use much older alignments, from the 1965-1980 period. The difference can be in the range of six degrees or more, very noticeable in the absence of wind.Todd
-
Compass errors
Did you add any scenery recently? This topic has come up in the past, and this problem is usually traced back to a FS-2002 scenery file being used in FS-2004.Try disabling any third party scenery you may have, and then adding it back, one at a time, until you find the culprit. Sometimes the offending file is literally on the other side of the planet from where you experienced the compass problem.Todd
-
Runway renumbering
Yes, using KIAD as an example, the old 1L and 19R ILS feathers should be relabled 1C and 19C.Just be aware there are some issues.First, AFCAD tends to get easily confused. It may try to associate your new 1L/19R ILS systems with the old 1L/19R runway.More importantly, altering runway designations will disable any instrument approaches at the airport. You will still be able to intercept and fly the ILS, but you won't receive the approach from ATC. The AI aircraft will receive visual approaches only.There is no quick and easy fix for this. You might try searching the file libraries for a utility called ILS and GPS Approach Creator. The author is Martin Gleeson.Let me know if you need more info.Todd
-
Runway renumbering
The Create a Flight menu lists the runway start positions.Are you sure that you updated these in AFCAD?Another possibility is that the Addon Scenery area is not active. Check the Scenery Library to make sure that the "Active" box is checked.Todd
-
Afcad Problem
Kane,Your solution to your problem is in your post.The ILS identifiers must be unique. Change them to whatever you want them to be.Also, if you are using the same localizer frequency for both ends, remember to uncheck the "activate back course" function.Todd
-
POSKY B737
Be aware that FS Nav displays localizer back course approaches on the map, by default. There is a checkbox in the settings that can turn this feature off.What runway were you landing on? In the real world, KSNA has both an ILS and an LDA (a form of offset localizer) on Runway 19R. If you were landing on Runway 1L, you were probably receiving the back course.Todd
-
A "takeoff:" question for Real World pilots...
The Clearance Delivery frequency is for issuance of an IFR clearance.Try filing an IFR flight plan in the Flight Planner. After loading your plan, you will be given an option to contact Clearance Delivery. Upon readback of your clearance, you will be given the option to contact Tower, Ground or Traffic, depending on the airport.In FS your IFR clearance will always be delivered "as filed." In the real world, that is not always the case.Todd
-
Nav Log vs VOR Radial ... error? Help!
George,This question comes up occasionally. It has to do with changes in magnetic north models over time.Airnav.com shows the EYW VOR has a magnetic variation of 1E, using data from 1965.The published variation for KEYW airport is 4W, using year 2000 data. The FSX flight planner and GPS also use magvar data from 2000.If you fly the J79 airway on a true course of 038, you will be flying the 037 radial from the EYW VOR (38 - 1 = 37), but your compass bearing will be 042 (38 + 4 = 42). This assumes the absence of a crosswind, of course.This situation is quite common in the USA. Many VOR navaids are defined using old data. FAA policy calls for realignment of the VOR when published and current magvar data are off by 6 degrees or more.Looks like they need to put EYW on the list.Todd
burle1
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited