Toxin

I did B) and I would love to see a Sperry 177 in my Tmouse B) :(

There must be a freeware DC-3 with nearly the same quality as the MAAM. I didn't test it but I read a review. Maybe this is something for you...Look for Charles Owen on Flightsim. Unfortunately the file isn't available on Avsim.The 2D-panel isn't the best, but the VC should be nice...Try it and keep us posted... :(

Just trying out the CitX C2.0 and I must say, wow, pretty nice aircraft. As customer of both versions it's a step forward in the V2.0Looking forward to the CitCJ1 V2.0 :(

Thought about to try ENB out, but can anyone confirm, that it doesn't work in window-mode?I've a FMC-solution where I often have to use the window-mode, so if someone can confirm, that it won't work then properly...

Uha, sounds excellent, then I have to wait for it. I love the CJ1 a bit more than the CX. But anyway, I'm creeping arround it all the time. :( :(

Really? For FS9 too? Oh, that would be really nice, because I like the CCJ1. If the Mustang would be for FS9 as well, I'm sure I would have it... :( Yeah, if I'm serious, if some developers would continue to make some nice planes for FS9, I would pay for it.The CCX V2 is a little bit too expensive for me at this time, but maybe there will be a coupon sometimes. I have the V1 and I'm ok with it at the moment. I don't know the difference.But...back to topic... I don't know much about freeware-bizzes, but the Eaglesoft CCJ1 is one of my favorite. I looked for a nice Learjet, pay- or freeware instead of the default one, but without success. Lars Roennig's Lear was called before. Veneaviones did a CCJ2, afaik.

For FS9 it would be a dream, I like these small biz-jets.

My last comment on this point, please don't get me wrong now:If I decide to stay at FS9 I do it how long I want to do that and then I miss nothing, because it's my decision. The only one, who will miss something, is the developer who won't get my money.Ok, anyway, all my respect to Carenado's decision, they are the developers. I respect the decision too, if someone wants to fly in FSX, or in FS9, everyone should do, as he want to do.Ok, that's it for me, there are tons of IVAO/Vatsim- and FS9/FSX-fights in the forums arround the world. Don't forget, we are a community, we all have the same goal, to fly virtual and having fun and that's possible with all four combinations and don't forget, about 7 years before, FS9 was the best for all of you.That's it. Three greens to all :( :(

How did you get to that point? With GE Pro, HDE v2 or REX Pro, etc. FS9 can look pretty well.But anyway, I don't want to support any discussion about FS9 or FSX, everyone should decide himself and everyone should respect that.

Hmm, I saw it coming, after the 30% discount. I bet, it was a test, how much fs9-customers there are...Things and time goes by, it's the way of time and every user can decide for him self, either he stay on FS9 and enjoy the things he have, or you switch over to FSX.Carenado was the best for me, but I won't switch over to FSX for the next time.Maybe there are some enthusiastic members, who further develop nice aircrafts, like the tinmouse *WINK :( if I can help, I'm here!

My last love is dead, bye Carenado.Maybe we meet us sometimes again... :(

Ya Tom, you're right, but they removed it long time ago.Anyway, I'm a Carenado-plane-Junkie :(

Something, which you couldn't wait for 7 years ago! :(

:( Thank you Ed! :(

Wow, the first modification looks excellent.Found a movie on youtube...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=occ1A_3EACg

NOPE...I don't ask this one and only question, NOOOO...and I won't ask...I'm waiting in my room calm and quiet...*whistleHave a nice week! :( :(

Sweeeet! Thank you Frank!

Nono, please not...

Indeed. Wow, nice lookin' paints...

+1Nothing to add your kind words, John

+1, can't find other words...Looking forward and I'm a proud customer of Carenado-products for FS9...If a company or better a developer isn't kind to its customers, who use FS9, they doesn't deserve any customer... To stay fair I won't tell any names.Carenado creates, keeps and lives the flightsim-spirit we want and therefore I'll spend my money and time.

Noticed this as well, in levelflight she has her nose a little bit up and hang down at the tail. In flight on flightlevel she would be very nervous if you wouldn't fly with AP on.Didn't find the solution and don't know where I could start for search.But for the moment try AP on and if it starts whipping try to get against with the trim until it calm down.

Did it as you described... but without loading the C172 before...APU on, engines off, then I went through the initialisation, step by step, all seemed to be fine until I move the throttle forward.I don't know, where my mistake is...Will try that to load the default c172 before...EDIT:It seems to work now...!So, what I've done:updated the panel-folder in fsconv to version 1.25 and gauge-update to 1.26changed the panel.cfgloaded the default c172 beforewas careful at the entries in the CIVA INSAnd yes, she's following her route now.I think the problem is solved, but I can't figure it out, if it was my mistake or any wrong config or anything. Of course in every case it was my fault, because the stupid sits in front of the screen... :( I'll enjoy my flight to the Caymans in my Bahamas 732 now.Phil

Thx vololiberista,My Civa is version 1.51Panel should be the Tinmouse-Panel, don't know who created it. (with 1.26 gauge-update, but don't know the version of the panel itself, maybe there's the failure)and I'm using a panel.cfg which I've found in the fsconv-folder called panel.CIVA or so.Does anybody have a working panel.cfg, which I could try. Maybe there's anything wrong?I think, I'll reinstall the Tinmouse...

Ok, today I tried it again step by step as described in the tutorial.It's not the first time as I'm using the CIVA, I made several flights in the B727 with success.BUTI'm not using the 1.25, because of several custom settings I made for me, but the 1.26 gauge update. Could be the mistake on this side?So again, all went fine until I want to taxi, then comes the mistake with throttle open, if I pull back the throttle the failure is away again.Throttle open -> failureThrottle idle -> no failure