Jump to content

Vargveum

Frozen-Inactivity
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    762

  • Donations

    $0.00 

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Vargveum

  1. Vargveum
    Welcome then! Sounds like you're having fun! B)
  2. Vargveum
    99.5 % 737NG. Ranging between 0.5 - 6 hours flight time. Always real world operators/routes. 0.5 % A2A PA28 / C172
  3. Vargveum
    RVR
  4. Vargveum
    Not sure I see the problem, but if you mean on the approach plates, it is right there. EDDH ILS 23:
  5. Vargveum
    What do you mean?
  6. Vargveum
    Haha.. thanks buddy!
  7. Vargveum
    Back in Oslo after todays roundtrip to Gdansk, Poland. Uneventful flight with nice flying conditions all along. DY1052/DY1053 Departing 01R ENGM Final rwy 29 EPGD Entering rwy 29 EPGD Cloud surfing on the descent into Oslo Final 01R ENGM Back on Terra firma. Thank you for flying.
  8. Vargveum
    Totally up to you. PFPX will give you the optimal FL based on fuel economy. That's what it did when it came up with FL300. However, if you want to replicate real world procedures involving FL restrictions, override PFPX and enter your desired FL manually. Personally, I'd follow the realworld procedures.
  9. Vargveum
    Absolutely magnificent!
  10. Vargveum
    Yeah, that's the way it's done in the real world on these routes B) Up - down. Exactly, watch the real world flights and see what FL they normally use. All I am saying is that PFPX isn't crazy, but if you know better (ie route restrictions etc) just override PFPX and put in the specific level you want.
  11. Vargveum
    Oslo is a great place to be flying into using FSX. Make sure you join Vatsim, if you haven't already. Oslo is very active with good controllers.
  12. Vargveum
    High 200s seems about right for that distance (162 NM). Not taking any (if any) ATC / airspace restrictions into consideration. FL300 is used routinely real world from Oslo to Stavanger (182 NM). So, PFPX isn't doing anything crazy here.
  13. Vargveum
    Great scenery, HL and... return flight Manchester - Oslo.
  14. Vargveum
    Thanks!
  15. Vargveum
    Oslo - Manchester (UK)
  16. Vargveum
    Proper Cave! I'd feel right at home there..lol
  17. Vargveum
    Cool! Will be flying our Cardinal down to Copenhagen next Friday. I'll try to take some pics as well then. I guess there is a forum here for real pictures also... hmm
  18. Vargveum
    Nice shots, Chicken! Real life flight in the Cirrus? HL: Looks about right this time Great scenery pics as usual!
  19. Vargveum
    Ha ha ha.. Amen.
  20. Vargveum
    HL, that is one big 737 ^_^
  21. Vargveum
    Danke schön! B) If that was for me... lol. Thanks. Glad you liked it! Very nice shots. Thanks for sharing. Looks like your "not-so-beastly" rig does the job just fine ^_^
  22. Vargveum
    AB6025 morning flight departing 23L at Düsseldorf bound for München.
  23. Vargveum
    To me, it's not so much the length of the cruise in itself that makes it boring to long-haul, but rather the fact that you are generally on your own up there for hours as ATC very seldom gives you 12 hours of continuos service on Vatsim (I only fly online, offline IS boring and lifeless). It's the dynamic interaction between man, machine and real-people ATC and fellow pilots that brings out the true magic of flight simulation to me.
  24. Vargveum
    lol
  25. Vargveum
    The reason for including true is that the magnetic inclination, or dip angle, at ENSB is 82.2. Making a magnetic compass possibly unreliable and erratic. You're correct that the difference betweeen True and Magnetic is the variation (declination). Yeah, for flight simulation purposes, you can skip a lot of chapters. Helps with the overall understanding of things though.
×
×
  • Create New...