Serbian_Pilot

x plane is getting better and better every day!

good thing is that p3d v2 performance is very scalable. My system is very low on todays standards, but with clever slider management I can get 20 fps on KSEA with Maule. Cheers!

@Opus Software you're welcome

Using FacetracknoIR with SimConnect output mode works great. I must say that I am using plug in that is part of version 1.7 that uses 3 led diodes, like freetrack, I am not using pure face tracking. It (face tracking) is very, very cpu intensive. If you use point tracker plugin with facetracknoir, you will be able to use 640x480 resolution and still get only like 5 percent of cpu usage. Always use Accela filter. You can use other, EWMA filter, but you must adjust sensitivity very good. Both filters can gave you good responsive and accurate tracking if you are patient with configuring of software. If you have any further questiones, feel free to ask

EZDok camera has outstanding cockpit shaking that is influenced by many things suck as g force, weather turbulence, camera resonance on touchdown. OPUS is very good too, but I prefer EZDok because of realistic very natural random shaking effects. You will not mistake in either of them! Hope I help a little

Lateat version of FacetracnoIR works suprisingly good, that is version 1.7. It has one new additional filter for smoothing out movements and I was suprissed how good it actually works. Give it a try guys!

My AMD Athlon 2 X3 435 at stock 2.9 ghz is acheiving in urban conditiones 20-25 fps with this plane. Hope this helps!

Hi guys. Great topic. It would be nice to hear your oppinions about HTR with default Bell 206. What do you think of HTR flight dynamics. Some people think that HTR offers more real , more twichy flight dynamics as in real Bell 206 compared to Dodosim!?

Yes, complete radio panel which is intended for wide variety of aircrafts . There is a software that is written in Visual Basic 6 with fsuipc datarefs. Works in all applications that communicate via fsuipc.Full working also low cost. At the bootom is touch screen - little display for auto pilot functions, also homemade and programmed. I can give additional details and advices is someone is interested. All software is completly free and OPEN SOURCE, you can make it better, it is our contribution to all good people out there.

This is additional software that is written by Bojan Kranjc that you can use to change individual analog axes sensitivity and enter zoom mode for axes.

This is my and my friend's Zoran contribution to flight sim community ! many times I read about various hardware that you can buy for for your flight sim that costs thousands of dollars LITTERALLY. ALL this CAN BE BUILT FOR LESS THAN 50 US DOLLARS INCLUDING MECHANICS AND ELECTRONICS and final product is very close or in some segment better that that overpriced controls that you can buy. Every man with average mechanican works ekill and with very basic electrical experience can build this. many part are those that you can find in your backyard like old horisontal case for pc , water hitter pipes, bike rubber grips, pipes from old washing mashine etc. This is preliminary homemade affordable high guality yoke, throttle quadrant and rudder pedals. Our friend Bojan has made a custom electronick for our homemade controls. Some of the features are: MECHANICAL FEATURES - high mechanical quality of all components and very sturdy design - smooth and responsive controls - yoke travel length for pitch axis of more than 200 mm ( about 8 inches) - yoke travel lenght in aileron axis 180 deegres - sturdy rudder pedals that have 8 inches back and forth movement ELECTRICAL FEATURES - Hight quality CUSTOM MADE ELECTRONICS WITH MICROCONTROLER P18F2550 or any other USB Pic - 10 analog axes with 10 bit electrical precision with 12 bit optional possibility - analog pitch trim control - 16 digital all purpose buttons and separatelly hat switch control - custom sensitivity that can affect individual analog axes adjustable throught custom software - noise free analog axes with posibility of dumping features JOYSTIK_BY_BOKI S59KB 8 BIT (author of elecronics and programming Bojan Kranjc our big friend from Slovenia) * Copyright: S59KB Thanks microelectronics, 2013 This is a simple demonstration of 8 Axis, 12 Buttons and Hat Joystick Controller Possibility of adjusting OFFSET potentiometer USING REFERENCES VREF+ and VREF- Due to the angle of the potentiometer. There are opportunities to expand the matrix of buttons Program to use USB_HID_desc * Test configuration: No drivers needed Tested on WIN_98 operating systems, Tested on WIN_XP 32_BIT operating systems, Tested on WIN_XP 64_BIT operating systems, Tested on WIN_7 32_BIT operating systems, Tested on WIN_7 64_BIT operating systems, Not tested on WIN_8 operating systems. MCU: P18F2550 or any other USB Pic Dev.Board: EasyPIC5 or any other. Oscillator: 4.0000 MHz SW: mikroBasic Pro v 3.2 Here is the link to our friend's Bojan Kranjc and his post on microelectronic site that you can visit and read some additional information and pictures of electronics. http://www.mikroe.co...hp?f=97&t=52576 if there is interest for additional details please let me know and i will gladly give you electrical scheme layout, required components (list), code for microcontroller programming etc. I am waiting for your oppinions

very good guys, you gave me excellent locations. What a beautiful in the world we live, what a wonderful places and what a wonderful people here on the forum, thanks again guys!

Great Derek, I never considered Australia for soaring, cant wait to try your home town airport!

Do you know any piece of scenery of orbx or any other scenery developer that has a realistic size of houses and trees. I know that autogen is about 2 times bigger that real life in order to conserve a good fps, that is alredy disscused on the forums here, but does anybody know scenery that can give us, virual pilots, an experience as realistic as posible in terms of autogen size. Oversized Autogen size gives a false impression of heihgt above terrain!

mr lateagain, thank you very much for your recommendation, I will give it a try, thanks one more time sir.