Sagal

Members
  • Content Count

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    Yes
  1. Sagal

    Aerofly 2 really bad, refunded.

    Your message at the time where other users are looking some feedback is particularly rude and inappropriate Early access is exactly the time where "All Aircrafts fly awful, not near any other simulator i know. Handling, controller options and user interface are very bad." can be fixed. Submit your complaint to Steam forum so that the developer can act on it instead of crying here. By the way give us a list of the early access games that you tried and were fine... From my part I have only Dirt Rally and Automobilista that were fine from day 1. if I think of Assetto Corsa I was quite unhappy at the beginning but after waiting one more year it was much better.
  2. I don't want to be too negative with Carenado, but the not all fps-friendly is really starting to bother me. They should really work on that. The latest exemple is the Phenom 100. I have to use one trick mentioned in this site to have very low and just acceptable fps (around 10fps in 3Dsurround at San Francisco: rename and therefore desactivate two files that came with it). They are the worst (Pmdg 737, VRS with Tacpack, M2000C, M2M F-15E are much more fps friendly). So I just can be afraid of what the new Citation could be....
  3. Nice topic. I do not have time to be hard core with regards to the gps and G1000. So from what I read, the Carenado Phenom 100 could do the job (and for sure I want to buy only P3D compatible in case I use it in the future). These 2 reviews were not yet linked in this topic. http://mutleyshangar.com/reviews/ag/emb500/emb500.htm http://forum.avsim.net/page/index.html/_/reviews/aircraft/review-embraer-phenom-100-by-carenado-r2369