Jump to content

Felipe Mendes

Members
  • Content Count

    11
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Neutral

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I really hope so my friend, but despite i can't predict the future, i'm really skeptical about this. They are already working on a new plane even before launching the mustang, and its making me very worry. If they are real serious developer, they will have to put aside the hawker project and work really hard on the mustang, before releasing a new plane, otherwise the name of the company will be comprimised, at least to me.
  2. I really wanted to fly a small jet that is equipped with the NXI, and the anxiety made me make this huge mistake that was buying this plane. The NXI is the standard one. Not a single mustang unique feature was added. The layout of the engine parameters are the default ones, totally diferent compared to the real one. The throttle in the real plane have 2 detents for takeoff and climb, that was not moddeled, and the clickspot for turn the engine on is terrible! The rotary test switch? INOP. Pressurization? forget about it. Environmental switches, like air source and cabin fans? All of them INOP. A lot of default sounds, except the engine ones, that seems fine to me. If the developer don't work to improve (A LOT) this plane, it will be the first and the last time they will see my money. I do not have the Honda Jet, but only what i've already heard about it, it's definitively a better choice instead of this one. 15 euros or dollars would be a fair price for this mustang.
  3. Well, the accent is very, very different, but i belive most of the words have the same meaning. We have a big portuguese community here in Brazil, i've spoken with many of them and we can perfectly understand each other. I heard once, and i don't doubt that, is that our portuguese is a little more complicated to write. We have a word (ç) and a lot of other rules that is very unusual in other languages, and make things harder to learn
  4. I dont know if there are many Brazilians here at AVSIM, but greetings from one of them!
  5. Hey, i don't know if someone already asked about this, and pardon me for being a little offtopic, but i have a question. Now that you are working officialy with microsoft and asobo, do you guys intend to continue releasing your G1000 (and others) updates as a "community folder" packages before incorporate them into the sims core? Or will we have to wait the sim's updates to see the improvements? The anxiety for seeing the improvements you are doing is killing me! Thank you
  6. Excellent, good job!! Loved the charts feature, used in my last flight and it works perfectly. I have a question, is there a way to see the pressurization status in this plane, like the press rate, cabin climb, or it isn't moddeled yet? In a positive case, would be nice to see its modelled, since it's a checklist procedure to keep following the pressurization as long as the plane climbs or decent. Thank you for your good work!
  7. I have no words to express my gratitude, thank you very much!! Just made a short flight, and for the first time i had no autopilot issues (entering in rol mode, etc..), except for some overshootings that i don't care much I'm just curious, what's the Working Title plans for this aircraft? Implement more systems, make the inop buttons operative, improve the flight model? Keep doing the good job guys!
  8. Of course i can. Will take some screenshots to show you better.
  9. I'm assuming the missing transitions in CJ4 is a bug because i can select the transition (same procedure) without a problem in garmin G1000, so i presumed this is not a database issue, but i can be wrong. I will test the navigraph database to see if there is a change, thank you!
  10. Adding the HSI needle was a great improvement, thank you! Can you tell me if you are working to fix the DEP/ARR transitions? There is a lot of procedures missing the transitions in FMC, and would be nice to see this fixed!
  11. Hey, congratulations for your project, definitely it will be a lot useful Maybe you can check this bug below and add to your fix list: I don't know if it happens at all airports, but i can't select the transition of departure or arrival charts in FMC. I tought the issue was due to the incomplete database of the sim, but it is not, because using the G1000 i can select correctly the transitions. Take a look at the imgs below: SBRJ airport, IH1C procedure, i can't select any transition that this procedure allows you to (BITAK, NAXOP, SIDUR, UMBAD waypoints) Using the G1000 i can select all transitions without a problem. Thank you in advance!
×
×
  • Create New...