RNAVV19R

I've given up on fly-by-wire aircraft in MSFS. No developer has been able to get it right. Not the Fenix with the A320, not PMDG with the 777, not iniBuilds with the A350. I just assume that the inaccurate modeling of weather, wind, and turbulence in MSFS is the issue.

I just saw in their FAQ that they have no plans to develop the modern large display system. That’s unfortunate, especially for anyone looking to do UPS ops when the freighter comes out.

Certainly seems like it should be a more than capable base and yoke. Does it have its own software by any chance? Can you customize its profile outside of the simulator?

I haven’t tried the 757 yet, but I’m just wondering, what yoke do you use?

Good to know. I imagine that the MOZA FFB Yoke won’t have a 757 specific profile soon (if at all) so it sounds like Tony’s 737 profile should be good enough. Looking forward to trying the plane.

It would be more than just the walk around. It has to support the new flight model so that it can work well with the new turbulence and wind effects. iFly is a perfect example of this. Works great in 2020, but in 2024 it doesn't handle these new effects well and it's not always fun to fly as a result.

This new version of DLSS differs from past versions. DLSS 5 uses neural rendering to improve things like subsurface scattering, material rendering, and overall lighting. It will reduce your performance, but it will produce a more photorealistic look to the sim. For most people, DLSS 5 will be irrelevant because it will tank performance too much, especially in MSFS 2024 which is already very VRAM hungry and hard on GPUs in general, so they won't even bother using it. This is for very high end systems.

No. Unlike other versions of DLSS, this isn't focused on improving performance. On the contrary, DLSS 5 will reduce your performance while aiming to produce a more photorealistic image. Based on this video, it definitely provides a more photorealistic look to the sim.

It's a video game. Every face looks creepy and lifeless to begin with. DLSS 5 just improves the shading and subsurface scattering on them, and drastically so. Also improves the overall lighting, especially in cloudy or overcast conditions.

I have high hopes for this, especially the flight model. I look forward to trying this out with the MOZA AY210 FFB Yoke. Hopefully we get a profile for the yoke soon after release.

Yep, no publicly available approach. But I was wondering if an airline may have created their own approach, in which case the chart (and the approach itself) wouldn't be available to anyone other than that airline and anyone else that they sold it to. It's a long shot that anyone here would have this knowledge, but was just wondering.

Speaking of RNP approaches, anyone know if one exists for RWY 14R at RJOO? Or at least a RNAV Visual? None exist in Navigraph, but I wonder if one of the Japanese airlines might have designed one. Not sure how common that sort of thing is in Japan. Here is the approach:

Different companies handle this sort of thing differently. Some airlines develop their own RNAV Visuals or RNP approaches and make them available to other airlines, though I assume they do so for a fee. An example of this is the RNAV RNP 13L/R at KJFK. It was developed by JetBlue, but there are other airlines that have access to it.

Fair enough. Does no other airline have their own RNP approaches for those airports in Alaska? RNP approaches seem to be so ubiquitous now and many airlines have their own RNP approaches for other airports.

I saw Sam's video, too. There's an Alaska pilot who vlogs some of his trips as well. I remember him showing a brief glimpse of the approach chart of one of those Alaska RNP approaches in one of his videos. But I can't seem to find it anymore. Perhaps he was told to remove it from his channel. https://www.youtube.com/@ThePilotLife/videos