AbrahamGR

well, that was not the question. I said: we cant save a choosen preset. When we load it, you dont have any button to save it (if you like it). On the other side, i cant find the "autoload" presets that Luis70 says. ¿?

Thank you vert much but….iwas talking about saving the others preset. ( imagine if you want to save one preset you liked in the 17th page of creators autoload setting?? Where. Is it?

Me too. When we find a preset that we like, we cant save it. anyway, the best app should be the one that combine different presets that change slowly every 30 minutes. (Slowly, soft…not like weather engines with cloud transition). like this, we could feel we change of place: change size, texture of clouds, haze, etc…. variation and poetry.

The clouds begin to be "those decorative things in the sky." The same with correct real air traffic that, since 2020, has been "promised", but that does not finish arriving. What keeps people alive is hope. That's why everything is prolonged and we are settling for less and less. I'm sure that the Asobo team and the developers of msfs and msfs2024 are wonderful people, but I'm also sure that the heads of marketing love to see the forums full of complaints. That keeps the company alive.

In recent times, the trick to sell is to show you a great teaser video and then: “Dont complain, that it is in beta.!” Feed yourself with periodic lists of fixes. I bought an apple yesterday but I couldn't eat it because it was in beta and had some bugs.

yes. Its terrible, also in MSFS202. simple clouds and almost clear skies wherever i go. we need someone who give us good news...some new weather engine:)

The longer the explanation, the bigger the lie

Every time I read the huge list of fixes of the MSFS2024 updates I ask myself: did all that fail and they decided to put the product on the market?

I agree with you. On each flight I take new surprises when finally everything seems to be Smooth some clouds appear out of nowhere that surprise me. I have varied all the options and the same thing always happens. The wxradar is showing always white clouds, but i never see them. When its clear skies, the wxradar has clouds. if i zoom on its radar map, those clouds appear. If i zoom more, those clouds dissappear. i must say active sky is a wonderfull product for prepare3d. Sorry.

Wow. What a novelistic mentality you have

Your narrative is convoluted. It's simpler: I buy the product. I try it (as many times as I want, not as many times as you tell me I should). If it doesn't work, I report it so they can improve it, and maybe I'll ask for a refund, until it does. P.S.: I've asked for refunds four times in my entire life. Not bad.

yes! Thanks for reminding me. Indeed, BATC refunded my money, and they were very kind. Actually, it's a habit to buy a product or a license and expect it to work as advertised. Although I'm optimistic by nature, and I've contributed a lot to the development of PSXT and REALTRAFFIC (investing my money monthly in a professional license and also testing and discussing it with its creators), I'm also a free citizen who loves to freely express his opinions about the products he uses, to encourage the critical perspective of future customers. The thing is, some product owners get offended (of course). 🙂 Thanks for reminding me about BATC. I'm currently using FSHud and it's wonderful, and also, in fact, PSXT with Realtraffic. Two highly recommended products.

Thank you for your recommendations

Thank you for your wise words, master. Divij, This is what awaits when you have a small unfavorable opinion. 🤫😁

In conclusion: “dear user AbrahamGR, shut up because, even if you pay for a professional license, you do not have the right to give us your evaluation of the products, because if so we can lose customers.” 😬

Yes. I bought it twice...hoping to understand, for example, the terrible key mapping design. It's designed to confuse, not to facilitate. The second time, I found that no matter what I did, the terrain textures were always blurred with too many trees. I requested a refund for Active Sky because, after three flights, I realized the METAR wasn't being interpreted correctly. What do I do? 300 flights? And yes, I'm always open to new opportunities if the actions (not words or teasers) prove that it actually works. Active Sky is a great product; I really liked it in Prepar3D.

Thank you very much for your reply. Here's another Active Sky user, from when I used prepar3d. So I'm also a fan of good products, undoubtedly like Active Sky. 🙂 My doubts regarding the AS2020 product stem from the fact that I've taken three flights today and haven't seen any connection between the METAR and what was happening in the sky at that moment. Of course, in the Active Weather option. In any case, I want to apologize, because my comment didn't mean to make you think you're just looking for money. On the other hand, you are within your rights. If I had a business, I would do it too! 🙂 But obviously, that's not what I meant. I was referring to the uncertainty I've had on these first three flights. The same goes for MSFS2024, wich i finally asked for refund two times. Since I've already requested a refund for AS, I'll almost be forced to buy it again next month, if Active Sky really works well. But i first have to think about it. As a reflection I share with you: don't you think everything is too difficult? I'm not referring to AS. But to everything that needs to be done to make a simulator work. All filled with tutorials to get some performance... that might wear the user out. Although those of us who love this: we never tire. Thanks!

thank you very much for your recommendations. I anyway asked for a refund, but, that doesnt mean i will not buy it again some motnh after!.) thanks!

Well, im in Active mode. (Thats why i bought the product) the update on approach is also checked on. But i discovered suddenly clouds dissappeared like ice creams with hot. but the most bad thing for me was just to expect a metar i read on the active sky map, but: it wasnt there projected. so… its like waiting every little flight expecting to see if it the metar becomes true or not. i dont want to dissappoint another users but that is my point of view.

Thank you but… what is DIY?

In reality, at no point did I intend to give an opinion that would upset anyone. I simply expressed my impressions of these wonderful products, and their shortcomings. That said, it would also be nice if they didn't jump to conclusions about what users can or cannot afford. Balthasar could hire better sources, and he can do so, and it's more expensive. Why not? On the other hand, I still believe that airport traffic coverage is poor. Really, more than an opinion, it's a fact: it's at this link: https://www.flyrealtraffic.com/coverage.html I love it, but you also have to know how to point out its shortcomings. That's why we're improving. This isn't the first time I think I'm helping, and suddenly I get told off. Hehehe Thanks!!!

With the best intentions in the world, I bought Active Sky, a little fed up with seeing such blue skies and few clouds on the horizon. I know Asobo's weather forecast is very good, but I checked Rex Weather Force and Xenviro, and finally decided on Active Sky. My surprise is that, upon arriving in Madrid, the METAR is predicting broken clouds at 6500 and 5000, and also at 8000, but I find a thin layer of clouds at 9000. This kind of thing baffles me. Why is it so easy to provide METAR information if it's actually ineffective? I'm thinking about getting my money back, because while it has many options, I honestly haven't been able to make sure that Active Sky represents the weather the METAR says it will, on several occasions. Likewise, going back to Asobo's default weather forecast is a bit sad. Is there a super-professional who has a great recommendation, and who doesn't belong to a company that just wants to sell its product? I have MSFS2020. On the other hand, I bought MSFS2024 twice, but it was impossible to fly. I read here on avsim that the MSFS2024 weather engine is wonderful, and, on the other hand, another team says it has a lot of problems. ? What does a user do? Thanks!

Hello. Im a user of PSXT and RT ProLicense. This binomial is very good and recommended if you want to see exactly the planes in the sky and at the airport. Indeed, the PTonly option is recording the planes that land at the destination before arriving. The bad news is that RT and PSXT have coverage only in some airports, but not in others. So, when you fly to some, you find yourself surprised that there is nothing. Or also that they appear and disappear intermittently, which is horrible for the immersion. there is a page where you can see the airport with good coberture or poor one. its still needed to have better coberture for regional airports,all over the world.

I subscribe to those words. Thank you for making effective the shortcomings that Msfs has in relation to air traffic. Certainly, it has an incredible point that such a large company with such a beautiful simulator has disowned something as important as air traffic, its immersion and its realism. Kiek listens to us and makes this great product! thanks!!!

Hello. Just curious… i have heard that asobo realtime weather is the most accurate, but sone other say activesky worth it. we are looking for variety, good combinstion of clouds and msny different cloud textures like sofly. But , in a dynamic way. what do you think?