January 18, 200620 yr I am definately going to buy both the 744 and 744F now because of the EPR thing!!! ;( Tears of Joy....YESSSS
January 18, 200620 yr Commercial Member >A question to PMDG however, is the EPR actually modelled so>that it is 'calculated,' or is is just for showVangelis does not do things for show... Ryan MaziarzFor fastest support, please submit a ticket at http://support.precisionmanuals.com
January 18, 200620 yr Well done gentlemen,Looking very good indeed!:)http://www.bootus.co.uk/pilotinfo.gif Armen L CholakianPMDG Sound Engineer
January 18, 200620 yr Please don't kill me for asking ;-) but what exactly is this EPR everyone seems so excited about?
January 18, 200620 yr Engine Pressure Ratio. Rolls Royce and Pratt & Whitney use it as their primary engine indication. GE use N1 as their primary engine indication. http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/epr.html
January 18, 200620 yr Thanks for the heads-up...even though I still don't understand in what way this is so exciting (please don't misunderstand me) how the engine pressure is represented - N1 or EPR. But I guess that is my problem ;-) Glad for everyone's sake that get excited by this :-)
January 18, 200620 yr Richard,because of the way that engines are modelled in FS it is difficult to model EPR with any degree of accuracy. There have been few FS aircraft to date ( only one I can think of is the DF727) that have modelled EPR well. Therefore it is quite an achievement to get an accurate EPR model in FS.
January 18, 200620 yr Hopefully people will appreciate that rather than just having it for looks.Wonderful news, congrats to the team.
January 18, 200620 yr >Richard,>>because of the way that engines are modelled in FS it is>difficult to model EPR with any degree of accuracy. There have>been few FS aircraft to date ( only one I can think of is the>DF727) that have modelled EPR well. Therefore it is quite an>achievement to get an accurate EPR model in FS.>Not to sidetrack, but the Ready for Pushback 747-200 modelled EPR extremely accurately. It's also been out for quite a bit longer than the Dreamfleet 727.I, too, am also excited to hear about that aspect, and many of the others the freighter offers :)
January 18, 200620 yr >Once you go freight, you'll think it's right!>Ok lame I know, but I used to be a pax hauler until I got>converted by the F. I only fly cargo now. ;)>>I agree. Freight hauling is the best, not as glamorous as hauling complaining pax, but it is more peaceful and more "free" to do as you please
January 18, 200620 yr If i buy the -400F will the EPR instruments also work with the 400? and also, are there respective soundsets for each engine? or is it all GE sounds? the freighter looks AMAZING!Adam
January 18, 200620 yr Author I was wondering exactly the same today when I had math in the classroom :DBTW. The soundsets are already respective to each engine...very small differencis, you almost can't hear them. But that's how it should be
Create an account or sign in to comment