October 30, 200223 yr Author Commercial Member A then D without a doubt! Ryan MaziarzFor fastest support, please submit a ticket at http://support.precisionmanuals.com
October 30, 200223 yr You know, I actually didn't even notice C until after Ryan's post. I'd love to see C done was well. :DRyan-Flightpro08 :-cool VATSIM Pilot/ControllerZLA ARTCC Senior Controller (C-3)SAN TRACON Lead [link:www.taxiwaysigns.com|Taxiwaysigns.com] Scenery Designer-----------------------------My "Home Made" System Specs:Intel Pentium 4 2.2GHz ProcessorTurbo Gamer ATX Mid-Tower with 420W Power SupplyEPoX 4G4A Motherboard with Intel 845G ChipsetVisiontek XTASY GeForce4 128MB Ti4600 (Det 41.03 Drivers)512MB PC2100 DDR RAM40GB Matrox 7200RPM Hard DriveWindows XP Home Edition SP1*No CPU or GPU Overclocking*3dMark2001SE Score: 11298-----------------------------Click [link:ftp.avsim.com/library/esearch.php?DLID=&Name=&FileName=&Author=Ryan+Fretwell&CatID=Root]Here to Download my New American Eagle POSKY CRJ-200!
October 30, 200223 yr Commercial Member Ok I will start with (A)ThanksChris Willis[link:fsw.simflight.com/FSWMenuFsSim.html]Clouds And Addons For MsFshttp://fsw.simflight.com/fsw.jpg Kind RegardsChris Willis
October 30, 200223 yr Hi Chris, (A) gets my vote. Then ©. Thanks for your new clouds paks and FsSkyWorldSE, it's outstanding! :-)Best, Rob
October 30, 200223 yr Yup,I go with the majority and would say ROADS and RIVERS too, Chris :-) :-outta Francois :-wave[table border=0 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=0][tr][td valign=bottom" align="center]"At home in the wild"[/td][td valign=bottom" align="center][link:avsim.com/alaska/alaska_052.htm]Don's Alaskan Bush Charters]"Beavers Lead the Way"[/td][td valign=bottom" align="center][br][tr][td valign=top" align="center]http://bfu.avsim.net/sigpics/logo75b.gif[/td][td valign="top" align="left" colspan=2]http://www.fssupport.com/images/moose2.gif[/td][tr][/table Francois A. 'Navman' Dumas EuropeRides ... and the man's Blog
October 30, 200223 yr Hey Chris!I would vote for roads and rivers. Bot basically suck at default. Roads with middle lines and WIIIIIIIIIIIIIDER rivers would be absolutely great!!
October 30, 200223 yr First before I give my choice, let just say THANK YOU to you & FSW for such a great effort on Sky World. FSW has stretched the seemingly unstretchable FS2k2 "engine" and its horrid Weather system and made it into something a LOT nicer to look at! You did a very commendable job considering the limits of FS2k2, and I giggle like a schoolgirl at the thought of what FSW could pull off with a "nextGen" weather system in a Flight Simulator. When I look forward to FS2k4, I dont think of the ATC improvements and Flight Dynamics, but as to what magic Chris can work with the Weather and how its shown.My choice is;(A) New Road, Rivers, Improved Coastline, Improved Water Reflection with (better frame rate option)Who knows maybe it can inspire some sort of Editing to properly runs rivers in meshes where they belong and something that Autogens moving cars on roads ala "Trainz".Keep up the great work Chris! You have shown great poise and patience since the release of Sky World SE under the "I can't get Skyworld to run!" et al. messages, Which hasn't been the case for all our beloved freeware authors as of late! :+ :-beerchug Edit for spelling
October 30, 200223 yr Chris, I do most flying at low level. For this, the generic textures are dreadful because most of them are covered with black splotches ( I assume the reason for this is to make them look better from high altitude). Anyone who brought out replacement textures that get rid of the black splotches would get my vote! Many thanks. I love the new clouds, by the way! Best regards, Chris Wright
October 30, 200223 yr Chris, my 2 cents worth! A > C > B > DThanks, I can't wait. And thanks for all your hard work!dek
October 31, 200223 yr A and D :)Thanks Chris for all the wonderful add ons and always answering my queries!Take care,alvin
October 31, 200223 yr Hi Chris. Flying for a living. One of my favorite times is approaching a large city at night and seeing the thousands of amber and white etc. lights. They look like shimmering jewels. The blobs of color used now are better...but in reality....you really see the pin points of light which really looks quite spectacular...especially along the California coast. Would love to see the night lighting enhanced with more pinpoints of light instead of blobs of color.Thanks for asking.You clouds are awesome,flying in the real world;about as realistic as you can get. wqould also like to see more enhancement of the T-Storm clouds. IE: more cloud to cloud and cloud to ground lightning. Might not be possible, given the limitations of MS WX engine. But, that too looks quite spectacular when your flying along a line of WX...from a distance of courseBest,Dave Baucum
October 31, 200223 yr I would have to go with everyone else here and say roads and rivers. :) The roads in FS2002 need the biggest improvement over anything else right now.Chris, your clouds look great! I really like the new high-mid level clouds in Fs Sky World SE. It sure makes a big improvement to FS2002! I thank you for the great improvements you have made to FS2002 and look forward to future improvements by you. Rob
October 31, 200223 yr Yes, no more black splotches in flight sims for me either--it's them old black splotches what tend to ruin the thing for me....But I also agree with the majority on the need for better roads and rivers, not to mention country lanes!Please start in Pasadena, CA, with the 210 Foothill Freeway!(And thank you!)
Create an account or sign in to comment