July 26, 200619 yr Hi I am just wondering if there is anybody out there (say with the very latest and fastest CPU) whose CPU does not run at 100% when using FS9?Just wondering.Barry
July 26, 200619 yr I have seen some people here, that have dual-core cpu's, say that theirs shows less than 100%.I have always thought FS would try to use 100% if it was the foreground application, no matter how much horsepower you put behind it.Rhett Rhett 7800X3D ♣ 96 GB G.Skill Flare ♣ Gigabyte 4090 ♣ Crucial P5 Plus 2TB
July 26, 200619 yr My dual core runs FS at about 50% and then another 50% is available for the system idle.
July 26, 200619 yr About 58% running an AMD 4800+ (dual core). With that said, I still don't get stellar performance with FS, just the way it's programed. Hoping FSX will make it more balanced between CPU and GPU.Regards, MichaelKDFWhttp://www.calvirair.com/mcpics/tfbeta.jpg Best, Michael KDFW
July 26, 200619 yr Author OK - so that seems to blow the myth that all machines run at 100% (using both cores) Barry
July 27, 200619 yr >My dual core runs FS at about 50% and then another 50% is>available for the system idle. Same scenario here.Is this a waste of potential processing power ? Is there a way to allocate more processing time/resources to a particular application, eg, fs ???
July 27, 200619 yr No, fs9 wasnt build to take advantage of dual core as thus not coded for it, hopefully fsx will be able to take full potential of it.
July 27, 200619 yr Howdy,I'm getting about 55% with my AMD 64x2 4200. Excellent performance with most display sliders max and 100% ai.
Create an account or sign in to comment